STEPNEY CHURCH, MIDDLESEX. THE parish of Stepney, or, as it is named in the "Doomsday Book," Stebunhythe and Stebanhy the, stands to the east of London, on the northern bank of the Thames, and formerly occupied a widely extended district, and, from the pleasantness of the situation, became the resort of persons of rank, wealth, and fashion: strangely contrasting with its present appearance, surrounded as it is with hamlets which have been, from time immemorial, separated from it. Henry, first marquis of Worcester, had a mansion near the parsonage, of which the handsome brick gateway, with a turret at one of the angles, is still extant. Sir Henry Colet, father of dean Colet, founder of St. Paul's school, lived in a spacious mansion, west of the church, called the Great place," now Spring Gardens," a place of public entertainment. 66 According to Dugdale, from the 26th of Edward I., several inquisitions were made to examine the state of the banks and ditches between this place and the Thames; and the tenants who were found negligent were liable to be presented as delinquents. The tracing of the old embankments and sluices might afford matter for curious investigation. The parish suffered greatly from the plagues of the seventeenth century, 2978 having died in A.D. 1625, not less than 6583 in A.D. 1665, among whom were 116 sextons and grave-diggers. A most calamitous fire broke out in a builder's, by the overflow of a kettle of pitch, in A.D. 1794, by which more than half of the houses were destroyed the number exceeding 600-together with thirty-six warehouses, filled with articles of combustion. "Ecclesia The church, known originally as was subsequently dediOnnium Sanctorum," cated to St. Dunstan. It may be considered as among the earliest ecclesiastical foundations; but there is no positive evidence in the architectural features of the present edifice to indicate a period earlier than the thirteenth century, or a little be VOL. XXI. fore the time when the manor was held by John de Pulteney, four times lord mayor of London, viz., in 1330, 1331, 1333, and 1336. However, the style of the greater part of the church is that peculiar to the latter part of the fourteenth century, and downward; and the only vestiges of great antiquity may be conceived to exist in the masonry of the tower, and the strong rubble, plentifully mixed with flint, of the walls. There are several monuments. In this church there is a mural stone dedicated to the memory of dame Rebecca Berry, wife of sir Thomas Elton, of Stratford Bow, and relict of sir John Berry, 1696. It bears the following epitaph: "Come, ladies, ye that would appear Like angels fine, come, dress you here; So she was dress'd whose humble life The same in low and high estate, Ne'er vexed with this, nor moved with that. As fair, as great, and good as she, The monument itself is one of the indescribable B 2 Biography. SIR T. POWELL BUXTON. No I. SIR Thomas Fowell Buxton, eldest son of T. F. Buxton, esq., of Earl's Colne, Essex, who married miss Hanbury, of Holfield Grange, in that county, was born A.D. 1786. His father died when he was very young, and left him, with two brothers and two sisters, under the care of his widowed mother. Thomas displayed, when a boy, those noble dispositions which marked his maturer years. His mother placed him at the school of Dr. Burney, of Greenwich, where he made good proficiency in his studies. In consequence of a conception that he was the lawful heir of a large landed property in Ireland (a conception never realized), he was afterwards committed to the private tuition of a clergyman in that country, and became an undergraduate of Trinity college, Dublin. Here he carried off the highest college prizes of each successive year, almost without exception, and also the medals of the "Historical Society" of Dublin. When he had attained the age of twenty-one, he was earnestly requested to become a candidate for the representation of the university of Dublin in the British parliament; there being no doubt of his election, should he be willing to offer himself on the occasion. Sensible, however, that he was by no means fully prepared for a parliamentary career, he declined the invitation, and settled down as a private individual, having married (in 1807) Hannah, the fifth daughter of the late John Gurney, esq., of Earlham Hall, near Norwich. His connexion with a family distinguished for philanthropy doubtless gave, or decided, the direction of his mind to those great objects of Christian benevolence with which his name is inseparably blended. Afterwards he became a partner in the brewery of Truman, Hanbury, and Co., and displayed, in his control and management of that vast business, the same masterly power which he subsequently applied to very different objects. But he was far, even in those early days, from being engrossed by affairs of a pecuniary nature. Many of his hours were devoted to the further cultivation of a mind remarkable for its comprehensiveness and perspicuity, and for its faculty of intense application. He was well acquainted with the best English poets, whose writings he often quoted with facility and point. But philanthropy was his great calling; and, under the influence of the highest principle which can actuate mankind, even the love of God in Christ Jesus, he soon became devoted in heart and soul to the welfare of his fellow-men, and especially to the relief of the most distressed and afflicted of his species. partiality for some of the practices of that body, he was led to attend the Friends' meeting, in Devonshire-house, Bishopsgate, and continued to do so, with his wife, till the year 1811, the year in which he became a partner in the brewery. "In that year they were persuaded by an excellent clergyman, with whom they were intimately connected, to attend this place of worship, then called Wheler chapel, Mr. Pratt having lately entered upon his ministry here. And most beneficial to them was the result, as well as to other members, direct or indirect, of their family, many of whom, together with the widow of the deceased, were baptized within these walls as adults, having been previously members of, or connected with, the society of Friends, several of whom have testified to me on this occasion how great was the profit which they derived, and in how lively a manner they still bear in recollection different sermons which they once heard from our dear father, Mr. Pratt. "But it was not till the year 1813 that Mr. Buxton became decided in his religious opinions. And in his case, as in the case of so many others, this is to be distinctly traced to two causes-the ministry of the word, and affliction. Mr. Pratt's ministry in this place was exceedingly serviceable to him, and prepared his mind for the teaching of God's providence in the school of trial. For this year God was pleased to visit him with a most alarming illness; and it was while in these deep waters that he appears to have been impressed with the evil of sin, the emptiness of the world, and the all-sufficiency of Jesus Christ. The ministry of the late rev. Samuel Crowther, who was then afternoon-lecturer at Bishopsgate church, and on whose afternoon-lecture he was in the habit of attending, was also an assistance to him; although it was from Mr. Pratt's ministrations that, under God, he derived especial benefit. And so attached was he to the same, that he continued his attendance on it after he removed from Spitalfields, and while he resided at Hampstead. For ten years he was a very constant attendant here, and here he first became a regular communicant, and received the emblems of his Saviour's dying love. The rev. Edward Bickersteth writes to me in a letter, which he states that I am at full liberty to use-I yet remember with deep interest the dear and honoured face of Buxton in his constant attendance at Wheler chapel, his marked devotion, and his breathless attention to the rich treasures of Christian truth and experience which our beloved Pratt poured forth from sabbath to sabbath.' Our departed friend had a large share of trials. Some years after, in less than five weeks, he lost by death four beloved children; not to refer to two other children who were also taken from him. But we would allude now, more especially, to his "In the year 1808," says Mr. Garwood, own illness in 1813, when he was about twenty"Mr. Buxton came to reside in Spitalfields. six years of age. And did he, suppose you, murHe had been baptized in the church of Eng-mur at this? So far from it, beloved, he ever land in his infancy, by desire of his father, who was a member of that church; but, by the death of his father, when be was very young, he had fallen to the especial charge of his mother, who was a member of the society of Friends, and having afterwards himself married a Friend, and retaining at this time a degree of esteemed it the richest mercy. You shall hear his view of it in his own words. In a letter to a friend, he writes: You call it a chastisement; but I never felt it as such. I looked upon it, when at the worst (and I have not yet ceased to do so), as a gift, as a blessing, and the chiefest of my possessions. When I was too weak to move THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND MAGAZINE. or to speak, my.... only lamentation was, that I And now, having found mercy himself, his enabled again to attend here. In a letter of a re- Mr. "In the year 1813 Mr. Buxton appeared as the public advocate of the British and Foreign Bible Society, at a meeting which was held for the formation of the North-East London Auxiliary, at the London tavern, in Bishopsgate-street, and at which the father of our present most gracious queen, his royal highness the late duke of Kent, presided. His speech is still on record. Buxton, from a very early period of his attendance here, professed himself, on principle, to be warmly attached to the church of England; but, when it was contended by the learned, that the word of man was the safeguard of the word of God, he at once saw how dishonourable to God and his word was such an idea, and how entirely it was opposed to the principles of the church of England itself. If the law,' said he, was once, Search the scriptures,' shew us when and how that law was repealed. The scriptures once contained the whole doctrine of Christ: let our adversaries show us the period when the All-wise and the Almighty, finding the insufficiency of his own work, condescended to seek improvement from the puny understanding of man.' NEW ZEALAND. THE following is the plan of the college instituted by the bishop:~~ St. John's College, Bishops' Auckland-Industrial System. eat. St. Paul's Rule and Practice.-"That ye study to be quiet, and to do your own business, and to work with your own hands, as we command you" (1 Thess. iv. 11). "Neither did we eat any man's bread for nought; but wrought with labour and travail night and day, that we might not be chargeable to any of you: not because we have not power, but to make ourselves For even an ensample unto you to follow us. when we were with you, this we commanded you, For we hear that there are some which walk that if any would not work, neither should he among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busy bodies. Now them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own "Ye remember, bread" (2 Thess. iii. 8, 12). brethren, our labour and travail; for labouring night and day, because we would not be chargeable unto any of you, we preached unto you the gospel of God" (1 Thess. ii. 9). this present hour we labour, working with our own hands" (1 Cor. iv. 11). "Yea, ye yourselves know, that these hands have ministered I have showed you all things, how that so unto my necessities, and to them that were with labouring ye ought to support the weak, and to remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive" me. "Even unto |