The Popular Educator, Volúmenes3-4;Volumen13 |
Dentro del libro
Ein Rothfehlchen fam in der Strenge des Winters an tas Kind , n , child . look . Wenn , if , when . Ine rote ' - keyl - yen kahm in dair shtrengʻ - ai dess vin ' - ters an dass Vogel , m . bird ( -lein , Kehren , to turn .
Still more was this costermongers is , of course , to be classed with the edible genus honoured by receiving the name Maia , that of the mother kind , though grouped with the portunians , or paddling crabs . of Mercury ; and it is ...
Complaisance , f . , kind . inquire . Sellier , m . , saddler . On this principle , that they have made the very best of any Malheur , m . , misfor . Succčs , m . , success . little power they had . Ease of acquisition in knowledge ...
It would be point only ; but it consists in uniting the extreme lights with advisable to procure a ball about the size of a cricket - ball ( this the decided shadows by semitones , which are liable to appear kind of ball , indeed ...
What kind of weather is it to - day ? 2. It is beautiful weather to1. Are we obliged to wait for our friend ? 2. No , not on his day , but it is somewhat colder than yesterday . 3. What opinion does he entertain concerning this thing ?
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
p159 - Lesson in Geology - Intermitting springs.
There are references to the southeastern railway in this account - the quoted publication date of 1767 is therefore incorrect as the SER did not come into being until at least 1838, and construction was not completed for a few more years after that - the article refers to the railroad crossing the path of the water from the spring.
This volume was published between 1867 and 1869. Specifically, it includes comments on admission examinations to Oxford and their schedule for 1869, which suggests that the volume was in print shortly before that. The reason to push it back to 1867 is the Google Books original date tag of 1767--it is possible that they picked up an actual date somewhere but either there was a typo in the copyright date (e.g., the Roman number representation of the year missing a C--as happened in another encyclopedia of the same period and is a fairly common typographic error) or the person entering the date missed the digit and typed in 7 instead of 8. Either way, 1867 is a lot closer to the correct publication date than 1767. And, by law, copyright date had to be within a year of the actual publication date.