« AnteriorContinuar »
ly requisite, in order to actions being either worthy of blame, or deserving of praise. And to this agrees, as is well known, the current doctrine of Arminian writers, who, in general, hold, that there is no virtue or vice, reward or punishment, nothing to be commended or blamed, without this freedom. And yet Dr. Whitby, p. 300, allows, that God is without this freedom ; and Arminians, so far as I have had opportunity to observe, generally acknowledge that God is necessarily holy, and his Will necessarily determined to that which is good. So that putting these things together, the infinitely holy God, who used always to be esteemed by God's people not only virtuous, but a Being in whom is all possible virtue, and every virtue in the most absolute purity and perfection, and in infinitely greater brightness and amiableness than in any creature; the most perfect pattern of virtue, and the fountain from whom all others virtue is as beams from the sun ; and who has been supposed to be, on the account of his virtue and holiness, infinitely more worthy to be esteemed, loved, honored, admired, commended, extolled and praised, than any creature : And He, who is thus every where represented in Scripture ; I say, this being, according to this notion of Dr. Whitby, and other Arminians, has no virtue at all : Virtue, when ascribed to him, is but an empty name ; and he is deserving of no commendation or praise : Because he is under necessity. He cannot avoid being holy and good as he is ; therefore no thanks to him for it. It seems, the holiness, justice, faithfulness, &c. of the Most High, must not be accounted to be of the nature of that which is virtuous and praiseworthy. They will not deny, that these things in God are good ; but then we must understand them, that they are no more virtuous, or of the nature of any thing commendable, than the good that is in any other being that is not a moral agent; as the brightness of the sun, and the fertility of the earth, are good, but not virtuous, because these properties are necessary to these bodies, and not the fruit of selfdetermining power. There needs no other confutation of this notion of God’s not being virtuous or praiseworthy, to christians acquainted with the Bible, but only stating and particularly representifig it. To bring texts of Scripture, wherein Cod is represented as in every respect, in the highest manner virtuous, and supremely praiseworthy, would be endless, and is altogether needless to such as have been brought up in the light of the gospel. It were to be wished, that Dr. Whitby, and other divines of the same sort, had explained themselves, when they have asserted, that that which is necessary, is not deserving of fraise; at the same time that they have owned God's perfection to be necessary, and so in effect representing God as not deserving praise. Certainly, if their words have any meaning at all, by fraise, they must mean the exercise or testimony of some sort of esteem, respect and honorable regard. And will they then say, that men are worthy of that esteem, respect and honor for their virtue, small and imperfect as it is, which yet God is not worthy of, for his infinite righteousness, holiness and goodness? If so, it must be,because of some sort of peculiar excellency in the virtuous man, which is his prerogative, wherein he really has the preference; some dignity, that is entirely distinguished from any excellency, amiableness, or honorableness in God : Not in imperfection and dependence, but in preeminence: Which therefore he does not receive from God, nor is God the fountain or pattern of it; nor can God, in that respect, stand in competition with him, as the object of honor and regard; but man may claim a peculiar esteem, commendation and glory, that God can have no pretension to. Yea, God has no right, by virtue of his necessary holiness, to intermeddle with that grateful respect and praise due to the virtuous man, who chooses virtue, in the exercise of a freedom ad utrumque ; any more than a precious stone, which cannot avoid being hard and beautiful. And if it be so, let it be explained what that peculiar respect is, that is due to the virtuous man, which differs in nature and kind, in some way of preeminence from all that is due to God. What is the name or description of that peculiar affection ? Is it esteem, love, admiration, honor, praise or gratitude : The Scripture every where represents God as the highest object of all these : There we read of the soul's magnifying the Lord,
of loving Him with all the heart, with all the soul, with all the mind, and with all the strength ; admiring Him, and his right•ous acts, or greatly regarding them, as marvellous and wonderful : honoring, glorifying, exalting, extolling, blessing, thanking and fraising Him ; giving unto Him all the glory of the good which is done or received, rather than unto men; that no flesh should glory in his firesence; but that He should be regarded as the Being to whom all glory is due. What then is that respect? What passion, affection or exercise is it, that Arminians call fraise, diverse from all these things, which men are worthy of for their virtue, and which God is not worthy of, in any degree ? If that necessity which attends God's moral perfections and actions, be as inconsistent with a being worthy of praise as a necessity of coaction; as is plainly implied in, or inferred from Dr. Whitby's discourse; then why should we thank God for his goodness, any more than if he were forced to be good, or any more than we should thank one of our fellowcreatures who did us good, not freely, and of good will, or from any kindness of heart, but from mere compulsion, or extrinsical necessity ? Arminians suppose, that God is necessarily a good and gracious Being : For this they make the ground of some of their main arguments against many doctrines maintained by Calvinists ; they say, thcse are certainly false, and it is impossible they should be true, because they are not consistent with the goodness of God. This supposes, that it is impossible but that God should be good : For if it be possible that he should be otherwise, then that impossibility of the truth of these doctrines ceases, according to their own arguInent. That virtue in God is not, in the most proper sense, rewardable, is not for want of merit in his moral persections and actions, sufficient to deserve rewards from his creatures; but because he is infinitely above all capacity of receiving any reward or benefit from the creature : He is already infinitely and unchangeably happy, and we cannot be profitable unto him. But still he is worthy of our supreme benevolence for his virtue ; and would be worthy of our beneficence, which is
the fruit and expression of benevolence, if our goodness could extend to him. If God deserves to be thanked and praised for his goodness, he would, for the same reason, deserve that we should also requite his kindness, if that were possible. What shall I render to the Lord for all his benefits 2 is the natural language of thankfulness; and so far as in us lies, it is our duty to recompense God’s goodness, and render again according to benefits received. And that we might have opportunity for so natural an expression of our gratitude to God, as beneficence, notwithstanding his being infinitely above our reach : He has appointed others to be his receivers, and to stand in his stead, as the objects of our beneficence; such are especially our indigent brethren.
The Acts of the Will of the human Soul of Jesus Christ, necessarily holy, yea truly virtuous, praiseworthy, rewardable, &c.
I HAVE already considered how Dr. Whitby insists upon it, that a freedom, not only from coaction, but necessity, is requisite either to virtue or vice, fraise or disfraise, reward or funishment. He also insists on the same freedom as absolutely requisite to a person's being the subject of a law, of firecefits or firohibitions ; in the book beforementioned, (p. 301, 314, 828, 339, 340, 341, 342, 347, 361, 373, 410.) And ef fromises and threatenings, (p. 298, 301, 305, 311, 339, 340, 363.) And as requisite to a state of trial, (p. 297, &c.) > Now therefore, with an eye to these things, I would inquire into the moral conduct and practice of our Lord Jesus Christ, which he exhibited in his human nature here, in his state of humiliation. And first, I would shew, that his holy behavior was necessary ; or that it was impossible it should be otherwise, than that he should behave himself holily, and that he should perfectly holy in each individual act of his life. And secondly, that his holy behavior was properly of the nature of virtue and was worthy of fraise ; and that he was the subject of law, firecepts or commands, fromises and rewards ; and that he was in a state of trial.
1. It was impossible, that the acts of the Will of the human soul of Christ should, in any instance, degree or circumstance, be otherwise than holy, and agreeable to God’s nature and will. The following things make this evident. 1. God had promised so effectually to preserve and uphold Him by his Spirit, under all his temptations, that he could not fail of reaching the end for which he came into the world; which he would have failed of, had he fallen into sin. We have such a promise, Isa. xlii. 1, 2, 3, 4. “Behold my Servant, whom I uphold; mine Elect, in whom my soul delighteth : I have put my Spirit upon him : He shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles : He shall not cry, nor lift up, nor cause his voice to be heard in the street. He shall bring forth judgment unto truth. He shall not fail nor be discouraged, till He have set judgment in the earth ; and the isles shall wait for his law.” This promise of Christ's having God's Spirit put upon Him, and his not crying and lifting up his voice, &c. relates to the time of Christ's appearance on "earth; as is manifest from the nature of the promise, and also the application of it in the New Testament, Matthew xii. 18. And the words imply a promise of his being so upheld by God's Spirit, that he should be preserved from sin; particularly from pride and vain glory, and from being overcome by any of the temptations, he should be under to affect the glory of this world, the pomp of an earthly prince, or the applause and praise of men : And that he should be so upheld, that he should by no means fail of obtaining the end of his coming into the world, of bringing forth judgment unto victory, and establishing his kingdom of grace in the earth. And in the following verses, this promise is confirmed, with the greatest imaginable solemnity. “Thus saith the Lord, HE that creat
ed the heavens, and stretched them out: He that spread forth Vol. V. W