Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

I. PROCEEDINGS OF THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (1) Public School Teachers' Superannuation; (2) Organization of the Education Department, Ontario; (3) Supplementary half-yearly Returns; (4) Selection of a School site; (5) Compulsory sale of a School site; (6) Commission of Inquiry, County of Dundas. II. DEPARTMENTAL NOTICES.--(1) Midsummer Vacation in Public Schools; (2) Collegiate Institutes and High Schools; (3) Examination of Candidates for Certificates as Public School Teachers; (4) Third-Class Teachers' length of Service; (5) Remittances by Inspectors and Trustees to the Education Department; (6) Statute Labour by Teachers; (7) Lists of Teachers and Schools; (8) Central Committee of Examiners; (9) The Journal of Education for Ontario; (10) Communications to the Journal

III. BORTHWICK OTTAWA INVESTIGATION-(Continued from page 55)

PAGE

65

Name.

Religious Per

suasion.

Country of

Birth.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

IV. PROCEEDINGS OF TEACHERS' INSTITUTES.-(1) Tyendinaga Teachers' Institute... V. LOCAL SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION. (1) Sketch of the Public Schools in the new City of St. Catharines; (2) McGill University, Montreal

73

74

[blocks in formation]

do. W. A. Gordon.. Methodist ..Ireland.. James B. Hilton Episcopal...Ontario.. Joseph Hugill... (P. Methodist England. James Kelley.. Methodist..Ireland. Allan Kennedy.. R. Catholic. Scotland John Mitchell Methodist..Ireland.. Wm. D. O'Mara R. Catholic. Alex. Rodgers... Presbyterian do. J. G. Bothwell.. Episcopal... do. William Russell. Presbyterian N. Brunswick " William Spotton do. Ireland.

Scotland

do.

[ocr errors]

66

E. G. Woodward U. Brethren Ontario Respectfully submitted,

..

25

[ocr errors]

66

125

[ocr errors]

66

50

[ocr errors]

18

66

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

St. Catharines. 49" Tp. Kenyon 75 " Watford... 145 " Tp. Warwick. 94 Eldon.. Goulburn. 66 " Bruce 53"

Toronto..

....

66 .71 37

19 Tp. Wellesley. 46"

[ocr errors]

VII. MISCELLANEOUS. (1) An old Teacher's Advice; (2) Where is your Schoolhouse: (3) How Hindoo Girls are made graceful; (4) What Skilled Labour does

VIII. ADVERTISEMENTS

I. Proceedings of the Education Department.

1. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS' SUPERANNUATION. COPY of an Order in Council, approved by His Honour the Lieutenant-Governor, the 4th day of May, A. D. 1876.

Upon the Report of the Honourable the Minister of Education, dated the 2nd of May, 1876, wherein he states that the teachers named in the schedule attached have complied with the requirements of the Act 37 Victoria, chapter 28, sections 95, 97, 98 and 101, and have submitted the necessary proofs in support of their applications for pension, and on his recommendation.

The Committee of Council advise that pensions be awarded to the said applicants under the authority of the 97th and 98th sections of the said Act, and at the rates therein provided.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Having to do with the administration of existing High and Public School Laws and Regulations and various routine matters of the office shall be under the personal supervision of the Deputy Minister, subject to such directions as the MINISTER OF EDUCATION may from time to time give. III. THE FINANCIAL BRANCH.

The details of this Branch shall remain in the hands of the Accountant, under the Supervision of the Deputy Minister. All financial matters shall be submitted to the MINISTER, except where specially provided for by law, or already prescribed. The expenditure shall be supervised by the Deputy, and the accounts, when approved by the MINISTER or Deputy, shall be sent for payment to the Treasury Department by the Accountant,

IV. THE DEPOSITORY BRANCH

Shall be conducted, as heretofore, under the direction of the Deputy, subject to the control of the MINISTER OF EDUCATION, GENERAL REGULATIONS, RELATING TO INTERNAL ECONOMY. 1. The Deputy Minister shall be responsible to the MINISTER OF EDUCATION for the internal management and economy of the Education Office, Depository, Museum and Grounds around the Buildings, and for the due and faithful discharge of duty on the part of Officers, Clerks, Messengers, Gardeners, Engineers and all others employed, who shall be subject to his orders. He shall also have the supervision of the Ottawa Normal School, and of the Toronto Normal School, so far as this relates to the current expenditure and matters of routine and detail, not necessary to bring before the MINISTER. 2. THE OFFICE HOURS shall be :

(a). FOR THE SENIORS-from 9 a. m. until 4 p. m., including
lunch hour. Where the lunch hour is not taken, the hours
shall be from 9.30 a. m. to 4 p. m.

(b). FOR THE JUNIORS-the hours shall be from 8.50 a. m. to
5.30 p. m., including the lunch hour, or where the lunch hour
is not taken, from 8.50 a. m. to 4.30 p. m.
(c). FOR THE DEPOSITORY (as a business establishment) the hours
shall be from 9 a. m. to 5.30 p. m. (except during the busy
seasons). The "Juniors" shall be in their places at 8.50 a. m.
The regulations as to lunch hour, and as to "Seniors" shall
apply to the Depository, except that some responsible
officer and clerk shall always be left in charge during Deposi-
tory hours. It is understood that during a pressure of work
these hours may be lengthened, and that each officer and clerk
shall do his own work, as may be assigned to him.
days the hours for the Seniors shall be until one o'clock, and
for Juniors and those in the Depository until 2.30 p. m.
3. Any questions arising under these General Regulations shall
be decided by the Deputy Minister, who (for disobedience or
other cause) shall have power to suspend from position and
salary any Clerk, Messenger or Servant until the pleasure of

the MINISTER is known.

On Satur

4. In the absence of the Deputy Minister, his functions shall, for the time being, devolve on the Secretary.

NORMAL AND MODEL SCHOOLS.

1. The Principals of the Normal Schools shall be responsible to the MINISTER OF EDUCATION for the success and efficiency of the Normal and Model Schools under their charge.

[blocks in formation]

4. SELECTION OF A SCHOOL SITE. MEMORANDUM of the Honourable the Minister of Education on the matter in dispute respecting the new site of the School-house of Union Section, No. 1, Charlotteville, and No. 7, Walsingham. 1. The substantial facts are not disputed, and the question depends upon proper legal conclusions from them.

2. The resolution of the special school meeting, held on the 24th December, 1875, was passed by the majority of the assessed freeholders and householders present, in conformity with the 24th section of the Act of 1874, cap. 28. There does not appear to be any valid grounds for contending that this was not a legal meeting. select the site in Walsingham, they acquiesced in the resolution of Although the Trustees were present, and moved an amendment to the meeting, which was to adopt the one in Charlotteville. There would appear to have been a difference of opinion between the Trustees and the majority of the meeting, but to give legal effect to this difference, under the 34th section of the Act, the Trustees should have called upon the meeting to appoint their arbitrator, while they nominated their own. The 34th section contemplates that, at any such meeting, the Trustees, or a majority, should be present, and that the arbitrators on both sides should be nominated, although, should the majority of the meeting appoint their's, the Trustees should immediately afterwards do likewise.

3. The resolution of the 24th December, 1875, would, therefore, have been the result of the special meeting convened by the Trustees, and binding upon them-as having been arrived at without any legal difference between them and the meeting, and their selection of the site must have been governed by this resolution.

4. The Trustees, alleging their ignorance of the law, convened another meeting on the 29th January, 1876, and it was competent for a majority at this meeting to agree, or not, to reconsider the the question. As I understand its action, the majority, recognising the difficulty which then clearly existed between them and the 2. The Masters, Teachers and all others employed in the Normal Trustees, appointed Mr. D. A. McColl as their arbitrator, and imand Model Schools, shall be directly responsible to their res-mediately thereafter the Trustees appointed Mr. Backhouse on pective Principals for the due and faithful discharge of their duties. Approved,

(Signed)

EDUCATION OFFICE,

Toronto, 28th Feb., 1876.

ADAM CROOKS,
Minister of Education.

3. SUPPLEMENTARY HALF-YEARLY RETURNS.

their part. I think in this there has been a compliance with the provisions of the 34th section, and that a legal board of arbitration now exists the County Inspector, or his substitute, being the third arbitrator. The arbitrators should meet and proceed to determine the matter in dispute, according to the 34th section. The effect of any award is also declared in and by that section.

5. But it is objected that the action of the Trustees, in proceeding to give effect to the selection of the Charlotteville site, precluded their convening the meeting of the 29th January, 1876. But, on several grounds, it is plain they were not concluded by anything of this nature. As Trustees bound to discharge a public

MEMORANDUM respecting Supplementary Half-Yearly Returns re- trust, they would be relieved on the ground of error and mistake, quired from Trustees of Public Schools.

I. This return is required in order that the duties imposed upon the Department, Trustees and others, by the 156th, 157th, 158th, 159th and 160th sections of the Public School Act of 1874, may be satisfactorily fulfilled.

II. Statement number one is necessary in order that it may be seen what children between the ages of seven and twelve have attended at the Public School of the particular section.

III. Statement number two is a necessary adjunct of this, so as to remove from the list of children, whose attendance is to be accounted for, such children in the section as attend elsewhere than at the Public School of the section.

IV. Section 157 expressly makes it the duty of the Trustees to ascertain the names, ages and residences of all children of school age in their section (distinguishing those between seven and twelve) who have not attended their school for four months of the year. This section necessarily requires that the return and statement three should be made to the Department.

V. The declaration required from the Trustees is incumbent upon them, if they have any intention of fulfilling the duties imposed upon them by the provisions of the Act referred to. Sub-section 2 of section 157 makes it their duty to notify personally, by letter or otherwise, the parents or guardians of the non-attending children, and in case of neglect on the part of such parents and guar

if Mr. Hutchinson had not agreed to have cancelled their purchase
valid, as not being the result of the joint consultation, at the same
from him, and the contract with him, though under seal, was in-
time, of the Trustees or a majority, at a legal meeting. At the
most, the contract, if valid, was entered into conditionally, with Mr.
seal would not prevent effect being given to the condition so as to
Hutchinson's concurrence, and the circumstance of its being under
enable the parties mutually to withdraw and to cancel the sealed
contract, even by word of mouth.
(Signed,)

Education Department,
Toronto, April 29th, 1876.

ADAM CROOKS,

Minister of Education.

5. COMPULSORY SALE OF A SCHOOL SITE.— CASE OF INDIAN RESERVES.

The question having been asked by a Rural School Board, whether a portion of an Indian Reserve could be taken for a school site under Section 35 of the Public School Act, the Minister directed a reply to be sent to the following effect:

"The Ontario Legislature has no jurisdiction over Indian Reserves, and no Provincial Act can therefore grant power to take such lands in invitum. The Reserves are administered by the De

partment of the Interior at Ottawa, in trust for the different bands tion for the commencement of the examinations of teachers for or tribes of Indians, under the provisions of an Act of the former the current year, for certificates of the first, second and third Province of Canada. Application to purchase should be made by class. the School Trustees to the Department at Ottawa.”

4. THIRD-CLASS TEACHERS' LENGTH OF SERVICE. 6. COMMISSION OF INQUIRY, COUNTY OF DUNDAS. A practice neither contemplated nor authorized by law has The Deputy Minister and W. R. Bigg, Esq., Public School sprung up in certain High Schools, to which the attention of Inspector No. 1, Leeds, were appointed by the Hon. the Minister Public School Inspectors is specially called. The regulations of Education, as a Commission of Inquiry into certain charges, provide that "a Teacher holding a third-class certificate may be respecting irregularities in the conduct of Examinations of eligible, in less than three years for examination for a secondTeachers, against the Rev. W. Fergusson, M.A., Inspector class certificate on the special recommendation of his County County Dundas, and W. A. Whitney, Esq., M.A., an Examiner Inspector." The intention of this regulation was that when an in that County. Of the investigation the Dundas County Herald

says:

Inspector in visiting Schools found that a Teacher in actual service, holding a third-class certificate was really an efficient "The Commission appointed by the Minister of Education, con- Teacher, and competent to govern a School well, such Teacher sisting of Dr. Hodgins, the Deputy Minister of Education, and W. might be permitted before the three years' probation had R. Bigg, Esq., Public School Inspector No. 1, Leeds, to investigate expired, to prepare himself for examination for a higher grade. the charges preferred by Mr. A. Loucks, Teacher, against Rev. W. It was also designed to meet the special cases of Teachers of Fergusson, M.A., Public School Inspector of the County of Dundas, some experience coming from other countries, to whom a three and W. A. Whitney, Esq., M.A., Examiner, met in the town hall, Morrisburgh, Tuesday forenoon. The Commissioners discharged years' probation as third-class teachers would be an unnecessary their unpleasant duty in a manner that won the respect and admira- hardship. In these two classes of cases alone were Inspectors tion of all concerned. The affability and courteousness of Dr. anthorized to exercise a wise discretion and to permit such Hodgins, his earnest endeavour to get at all the facts of the case, Teachers to compete for a higher rank in their profession in and at the same time eliminate extraneous matters, and to prevent Ontario, before the expiration of the three years' probation fixed personalities or the imputations of ill motives being imported into by the regulations.

the investigation, were very highly spoken of by all present. The

facts adduced were of an unexpected and unusual character that In some cases, however, which have come under the notice of the evidence clearly established the truth of what had been charged the Department, Inspectors have not acted on this view of the in these columns better than a year ago. It was conclusively shown that the third class arithmetic and algebra papers were opened before the proper time, and in the hands of some of the candidates, and the information thus obtained communicated to other candidates."

The evidence and proceedings in this case will be published in the Journal of Education.

II. Departmental Notices.

1. MIDSUMMER VACATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

case, but have allowed pupils of High Schools holding third-
class certificates to compete for second-class certificates, appar-
ently on account of what additional literary qualifications they
may have been able to acquire during a brief attendance at
mitted to act as monitors for a short time, &c.
such a High School. Sometimes such pupils have been per-

The rule to be observed in future in all these cases, must be that none but third-class teachers in actual service, of the required age, and who evince in their Schools special aptitude for teaching and government, shall be eligible for recommendation by Inspectors for second-class certificates, before the expiration of their three years' probation.

TO THE EDUCATION. DEPARTMENT.

In view of the examination of candidates for Teachers' certificates occurring this year on the 10th July, and following 5. REMITTANCES BY INSPECTORS AND TRUSTEES days, and for other considerations, the Hon. the Minister of Education has decided to authorize the closing of the Public Schools for vacation on Friday, 7th July, instead of on the 15th.

2. COLLEGIATE INSTITUTES AND HIGH SCHOOLS. The next Entrance Examinations will be held on Tuesday and Wednesday, the 27th and 28th days of June, 1876.

Any Candidate who fails at the above-mentioned or at any subsequent Examination, to obtain one-third of the marks in any subject will not be considered by the High School Inspectors to have shown that "competent knowledge" of the subject which the law requires, notwithstanding his having gained 50% of the total. (See Regulations for the Admission of Pupils.)

Persons having to make remittances to the Education Department of Ontario, will please send the same, if to the amount of $50 or over, through an agency of the Bank of neighbourhood. The amount can be deposited at the agency Commerce, or the Bank of Montreal, if there be one in the to the credit of the Minister of Education, and the duplicate bank receipt enclosed with the letter of advice to the Education Department. Small amounts should be sent by P. O. Order. All money letters to the Department should be registered.

6. STATUTE LABOUR BY TEACHERS. Teachers frequently write to the Department, remonstrating In order to prevent any misunderstanding of the intention of against their being required to perform Statute Labour, or to the Regulations, Local Examiners are hereby reminded that the pay any equivalent for it. As the obligation arises under the object of the Examinations is to prevent unqualified Pupils from Assessment, and not under the School Law, the Department entering the High Schools, and that in fixing a minimum of has no jurisdiction in the matter, and cannot therefore interfifty per cent. of the total marks assigned, it is not expected that fere in it. the Local Boards will divest themselves of their judgment or of the power to exclude candidates who make a total failure in the fundamental subjects of Primary Education. Candidates should give notice at once of their intention to attend.

3. EXAMINATION OF CANDIDATES FOR CERTIFICATES AS PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS.

Under the regulations for the examinations, Monday, the 10th day of July, has been appointed by the Minister of Educa

7. LISTS OF TEACHERS AND SCHOOLS. Application for lists of Teachers and Schools has frequently been made to the Education Department and to the Inspectors. The objects are sometimes good ones, although not always, for circulars of a pernicious character have now and then been circulated among the Teachers, many of whom are young men and women. The applications have therefore without exception been declined, as it would be difficult and undesirable to make exceptions in favour of some and not of others.

[blocks in formation]

9. THE JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR ONTARIO. It is proposed that The Journal be continued as a publication for the following objects:

1. Departmental notices and proceedings.

2. Regulations of the Education Department and Orders in Council respecting educational matters.

3. Explanatory papers for the information of Inspectors, Masters and Teachers.

4. Legal decisions on educational points.

5. Proceedings of Teachers' Institutes, Associations and Conventions.

6. Matters connected with local administration.

7. Communications (See Notice).

8. Extracts from periodicals, &c., upon educational subjects. 9. Acknowledgement of books.

10. Advertisements on educational subjects will be inserted in The Journal.

EDUCATION DEepartment, Toronto, 15th March, 1876.

ADAM CROOKS, Minister of Education.

10. COMMUNICATIONS TO THE JOURNAL. While communications on educational subjects of general interest are invited, they must be considered as expressing the views of the writer. Political discussions are to be avoided. The essentials of each communication should be conciseness, and a subject-matter relating to school management, discipline, progress, teaching and other questions of administration.

Inspectors, Trustees and Teachers, as well as all others interested in education, are invited to avail themselves of The Journal for this purpose.

III. Borthwick Ottawa Juvestigation.

(Continued from page 55.)

[NOTE.-By some oversight the following evidence of Mr. Rathwell was omitted in the last Journal. It should have come in near end of the first column of evidence on page 52, immediately after the reading of the sixth charge.-Editor.]

Q.-To what time was it extended? What do you suppose to be the least? A.-I should say the least was about ten minutes. Q. And the greatest? A.-I really could not state. Q.-Have you any distinct recollection that the time for the arithmetic paper was extended? Was it from noon till the hour the next paper was taken up, or how long? A.-I do not remember.

Q. Do you think it was extended to one o'clock? A.-I cannot really say, but I think it may have been extended to a quarter

to one.

By Mr. McDowall, Complainant:

Q. Do you remember the names of the candidates under examination upon that occasion. A.-I do. I remember some of them at least.

Q.-Were Mr. Martin, Miss Eliza Living, Miss C. Rathwell, Miss Annie Stacey, Miss Annie Pilson, Miss Hastey and Miss M. Gillmour candidates among the number? A.-I think the time was extended when these candidates were being examined.

Q. How long do you think the time was actually extended? Did you say to a quarter to one? A.-I have said that is possible, although I do not think it was so long. If I remember rightly, I went home to dinner myself at noon, and came back at the usual time.

Q. When you came back, were there none of the candidates writing? A.-I do not know.

Q.-On your return, how did you get into the room? A.-I do not remember.

Q.-Was the door locked? A.-I do not remember.

fit of the extension? A.-I could not say. Q.-I mean during the time the candidates were having the bene

Q.-You do not remember whether one of the doors was locked! A.-I do not.

[blocks in formation]

Q.--For what reason was the time extended? A.-I think we extended the time because some of the candidates were late.

Dr. Hodgins.-But you know, Mr. Rathwell, that the law expressly provides that no allowance shall be made and no extension of time granted because a candidate is late? Mr. Rathwell.—I am

aware.

Q.-Had the examination opened at the specified hour? A.—I do not remember. Probably Mr. Borthwick does.

M. Borthwick was requested to say whether he remembered why the time was extended.

Mr. Borthwick.—I cannot say the reason why the time was extended upon this particular occasion, but I know for a fact that a little additional time has been granted more than once. On one or two occasions, at least, we were not prepared to begin at the exact moment, but to my knowledge we did not much exceed the allowed space.

Examination of Mr. Rathwell resumed.
By Mr. Le Sueur, Commissioner:

Q.-At whose suggestion was the time extended? Was it at yours? A.-I do not think it was mine, but I believe we talked the matter over amongst us. Some of them did not seem to have been done with their work, and we thought it would be well to give them a little longer.

A.

Q-But you do not remember how long? A.-I do not.
Q.-Were the majority of the candidates finished within the time?
-Some of them were done before the time was up.

[ocr errors]

the larger, if I remember rightly. Q. Was the larger or the smaller number behind? A.-I think

Q.-And in consideration of that fact, time was extended? A.— I think so,

Q.-From whom did the proposition for extension emanate ? A. -I do not remember who mooted the question. It may have been Mr. Borthwick, but of that I am not certain. I know we extended the time on different occasions, but I could not recall this particular been, I remember the circumstance. one until the names were mentioned to me. Now that they have

Q.-You extended the time as a matter of indulgence to some of the candidates? A.-Yes, I think so.

By Dr. Hodgins, Chairman :

Q.-Have you any idea of the number not finished? A.-Six or seven perhaps.

By. Mr. McDowall, Complainant:

Q.-Do you recollect among those that were behind any of the A.-I think she was one. following names? Miss E. Living, (Candidate) was she one ?

Q.-Miss Annie Stacey? (Candidate.) A.-I think so.
Q.-Miss Rathwell? (Candidate.) A.-Yes.

Q.-Miss Kate Pilson? (Candidate.) A.--I am not positive, but she may have been. The fact is, I did not know them from one another in most instances.

Q.-Was Miss Hastey one? (Candidate.) A.-I do not recollect. Q-Or Miss Brown? (Candidate.) A.-1 do not know. I would not be positive, but I think she was not.

Q.-Miss Fleming? (Candidate). A.-I have no recollection that she was.

Q.-Miss Gillmour? (Candidate.) A.-She may have been. Q.-Miss Annie Pilson? (Candidate.) A.-I have no reason to doubt she was, but I am not positive.

By Mr LeSueur, Commissioner:

Q.-How many examiners were present? A.-Three. Mr. Borthwick, Mr. McMillan and myself.

Q. Whatever took place there was the act of the Board? The extension was? A.—Exactly so.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Q. May Mr. McMillan (Examiner) not have been aware that the extension was so long, or whether or not it was for three quarters of an hour? A.-He may, or may not have been.

Q.-Did Mr. Borthwick and yourself consult? A.-I do not think we did.

Q. You did not make the suggestion to him? A.-I think it was made by us all.

Q. Are you aware whether Mr. McMillan (Examiner) was there when the extension was granted? Do you think he knew of it? A.-I do not know.

By Mr. LeSueur, Commissioner:

[blocks in formation]

Q. I understand you to mean that you did not deviate from the programme except in regard to the extension of time? A.-Except in one examination, but I do not know that it was for 1874, or 1875. Upon the particular occasion, I think they were two Boards meeting in the same building, and some of the candidates wanted to get away by the train. They therefore wanted to have one subject within an hour not set apart for it. Some teacher objected to that after the papers had been opened, and they were taken up again and the intended proceedings abandoned.

Q.-Did the Board agree to this? A.-We understood that it

was 80.

Q.-Except in these instances, were the subjects entered upon proceeded with as specified upon the programme? A. Yes. Q.-You say that you did not carry out the arrangement? A.Yes, on the objection raised by a teacher.

Q.-What reason did he urge? A.-That it was out of form. Q.-Did the parties remain who were to go away. A. Yes. By Mr. McDowall, Complainant.

ask the witness why it was that the arrangement was agreed to by all the examiners? Perhaps Rev. Mr. May, County Inspector, might be able to state.

Evidence continued from page 55.

Miss C. Rathwell, (Teacher,) sworn by Mr. Slack, Commissioner, and examined by Mr. McDowall, Complainant : Q. -You are a teacher in Central School East? A.-I am. Q.-You were a candidate for a second class certificate in 1874 ? A.-I was.

Q-During the time you were under examination for your certificate, were the answers to the questions in Natural Philosophy written upon the board? A.-They were.

Q.-By whom? A.-I do not know.

Q.-You did not see any one write them? A. -I did not. Q.-But you know they were put up there during the time the examination was in progress? A.-Yes.

By Dr. Hodgins, Chairman :

Q.-During the time of the examination upon that paper? A.I think so.

Q. When did you see them? when I went into the room.

A.-I did not notice them

Q.-But you did notice them before you left the room? A.-Yes. Q. What position were you sitting in with regard to the blackboard. A.-Facing it.

Q.-But you saw no one write these answers upon the blackboard? A.-I did not.

Q.-Who presided at these examinations? A.-Mr. Rathwell, Mr. McMillan and Mr. Borthwick.

Q.-Was there any one along with the Inspector during the examination in that particular subject? A.-The others came in frequently, but I do not think they were in all the time. Q.-But they did come in and out? A.-Yes.

Q. And during that time this writing was on the black-board? A.-Yes.

Q. What was the writing? A.-The answers to the questions in Natural Philosophy.

Q.-The paper in which you were being examined? A.-Yes. Q.-And you saw this writing on the board? A.—Yes, sir. Q.-Before you concluded working on your paper? A. Yes, sir. Q.—Did you avail yourself in any way of the answers at the time? A. -I do not know. I suppose if there was any advantage to be derived from them, I might have had it.

Q.-But did you have it? Did you compare the answers you had upon your own paper with those upon the board? A.-I do not think I did. I felt my paper would be a failure in any case. By Mr. Le Sueur, Commissioner:

Q. Are you acquainted with Mr. Borthwick's writing? A.

Q.-Do you not remember that this took place in 1874-5? A.- I am. I do not know that it was in 1874.

Q.-You remember that in 1874 there was some deviation from the regular programme? A.-I remember there was one examination at which there was a deviation, but whether it was in 1874 or what particular year I do not remember.

By Mr. Gibb, Counsel for Mr. Borthwick :

Q. Can you distinguish it from other writing? A. Yes.
Q.-Is it peculiar? A. Yes.

Q. Can you say whether it was his writing that was upon the black-board? A.-I cannot remember. By Dr. Hodgins, Chairman:

Q. Are you positive they were answers to the questions? A.—

Q.-How long have you been a School examiner ? A. For I was not positive at the time I was in the room, but I noticed the three or four years.

By Mr. McDowall, Complainant:

Q.-Have you told the whole truth in this matter? Have you kept anything back?

The Chairman ruled that this was an improper question, and could not be put.

By Mr. Le Sueur, Commissioner :

Q.-You speak of a change from one subject to another, would that have given any advantage to one or more of the candidates A.-I do not think so.

Q.-It was not done with a view to give advantage to any one? A.-It was not. It was for the purpose of accommodating parties who desired to leave by the train.

By Mr. McDowall, Complainant :

?

Q. Why did these parties want to leave? Were they not writing upon the same papers as the others? A.-Some of the second class candidates did not write in all the papers. I think it must have been a voluntary paper they asked permission to write out of usual order; a teacher, as I have said, objected, and we carried out the original arrangement. Whether I have stated the actual facts I am not quite sure, but to the best of my remembrance I have. Dr. Hodgins-It could not have been for the advantage of any candidate present here in Ottawa to change the time of giving out the papers, but a candidate, if he had a confederate in any other district, might telegraph such information to him as would assist him materially in the solution of his questions. I would like to

list, and after I left the room I heard other candidates say they were the answers.

Q.-Were they answers to the questions which you were solving? A.-I do not know what they were, except from what my impressions were on having seen them, and what I heard others say afterwards.

[blocks in formation]

By Mr. Le Sueur, Commissioner:

Q.-You say, if I remember rightly, you think it was Mr. Borthwick's writing;-are you certain it was, or are you not? A.-I cannot be certain. I did not think about the matter at the time. By Mr. McDowall, Complainant:

Q.-Were you aware that small pieces of paper were passed round to candidates during the examination in one of the branches upon one occasion? A.-They were handed to all. Q.-Did you get one? A.-I did.

Q. What was written upon your one? questions in Arithmetic. Q.--Had that examination been held? the time.

A.-The answers to the

A.-It was going on at

« AnteriorContinuar »