CHAP. VI.

The words Church, Church of Chrift, Catholick Church, often used to fignify a part of the Univerfal Church, The Church of Rome may perish, and yet the Catholick Church be preferved,

p. 113

p. 120 By the word CHURCH to be underflood the Faith, Worship, and Polity of the Church,

CHAP. VII.

p. 130

Dr. Hickes's farther Vindication of his Answer to the Miffioner's Challenge, Name your Bishops, Writers, &c. 900 or 1000 Years before the Separation, The difference fhewn between a Church morally and metaphyfically True, Idolatrous Worship proved upon the Roman Church,

p. 135

p. 139

p. 147

p. 145 The Sin of Idolatry does not deftroy the Being of a Chriftian, An Idolatrous Church may become a pure and mo rally Holy Church upon Repentance and Refor

mation,

p. 150

The Doctor's Charity for the Church of Rome,

CHAP. VIII.

p. 152

The Church of Rome no Vifible Church of Chrift, i. e. of faithful Men, where the Sacraments are duly adminiftred. Allow'd to be a Real (though an Impure) Church,

p. 152

P. 160

The

The Church of England no new (but a renew'd and

reform'd) Religion,

CHA P. IX.

p. 16r

The promife of Indefe&ibility falfly arrogated to the Roman Church, p. 163 Several other Churches have vifibly continu'd (tho not always flourished) from their Foundation to this prefent day, 'p.. 170 Our Ancestors 900 Years ago had no fuch occafion as we, to protest against Popish Innovations,

ibid.

p. 171 Our Faith the fame it was 900 or 1000 Years before Luther, The Council of Trent a pack'd Council, neither Free nor General, P. 172 The Church of England defended from the Charge of Herefy, P. 174, 175 Multitude no Argument for Univerfality in the Roman Church,

p. 180

Chrift the only Head, under which the whole Body of the Catholick Church is united,

CHA P. X.

P. 182

The Doctor's repeated Challenge to the Miffioner's to fhew the Antiquity, Univerfality, and Succeffion for the Trent Do&rines during the firft five or fix Centuries. p. 188, 189

Some Letters which passed between the Miffioner and Dr. Hickes, before the Do&or fent bim an Anfwer to his Reply,

P. 197

The Miffioner's Letter with this Query, By what Linage do you make your Defcent good from

the

the 4th Century to the pretended Reforina

tion.

The Doctor's Anfwer,

The Query turn'd upon the Miffioner,

ibid.

p. 198

p. 200

The Miffioner's Reply to the Doctor's Answer,

P. 208

P. 204 The Character of COCCIUS, to whom he refers the Doctor, in the Margin, The infwer written to the Miffioner's Reply by one of the Doctor's Friends,

p. 211

A Letter of Monfieur de Meaux to Robert Nelfon, Efq; in French,

Tranflated into English,

Dr. Bull's Answer to that Letter,

p. 227

p. 229

Sect. I. p. 232

The Roman Church and the Catbolick Church not convertible Terms, p. 233 The great danger of their Salvation, who live in Communion with the Church of Rome, p. 234 The infallible affiftance of the Holy Ghoft in the Council of Nice, or any other truly General Council, no Argument for Communion with the Church of Rome, P. 235 The Doctor's Anfwer to the Bishop's Question, What is meant by the Catholick Church? p. 237 The Corruptions of the Church of Rome detected, Sect. II,

In Government,
---In the Rule of Faith,

P. 239 Sect. III, p. 243

The Reverend Mr. Leflie's Answer to the aforefaid
Bishop's Letter.
What is to be ant by the Catholick Church,

p. 303 The Government of the Church committed to Bifhops, who were diftinguished by the Titles of

Diocefan

Diocefan Bishops, Metropolitans, Primates, and Patriarchs,

p. 305

P. 304 From whence the Council of Bishops in the Empire were filed Oecumenical, The Patriarch of Conftantinople claimed the Primacy upon the Seat of the Empire's being tranflated thither from Rome, ibid. An Univerfal Primacy difclaimed and protefted against by Pope Gregory the Great, Bishop of Rome,

p. 306

The Pope's Supremacy limited by the Gallican. Church,

p. 306, 307

p. 307

That limitation disputed,
Reafon for difowning the Pope's Supremacy

ibid.

The fame Reafons might be urged for an Univerfal Monarch, as for an Univerfal Bishop,

p. 312 His Anfwer to the Bishop's Queftion, How feveral Churches can be that Kingdom of Chrift_not divided in it felf, and which can never fail?

P. 313, 314

The Schifm of fuch as have broke off from fubjection to their lawful Bishops, juftly charged upon the Pope's pretended Sovereignty, p. 318 Every Bishop in his own Diocefs may condemn an Herefy, but no Council of Bishops can alter any Fundamental Article of Faith, The Dispute not yet determined where the Infalli bility is placed,

p. 321

p. 322

A Letter to an English Priest of the Roman Communion at Rome, from Robert Nelfon, Efq;

His Opinion of a pretended Miracle,

p. 325 Infallibility has no foundation either in Holy Scripture or primitive Antiquity,

P. 327, 328

The

The Holy Scriptures and Fathers afperfed by fome of the Romish Writers,

APPENDIX.

p. 330

Mr. Herbert Thorndike's Judgment of the Church

Mr. Chillingworth's Letter of the Infallibility of

of Rome,

the Church of Rome,

The Creed of Pope Pius IV.

Paper I.

Paper II.

Paper III.

Bp. Cofin's Letter to the late Countess of Peterborough, concerning the difference in the chief points of Religion between the Church of Rome and the Church of England, Pap. IV. A publick Office of daily Devotion for the feven Canonical Hours used in the time of the Saxons, with a Tranflation and Notes of the Reverend Mr. Elftob.

Page

ERRATA.

Age 67. Line 26. read in quo libro (proh dolor! ) p.ibid. 1. 28.r. Maximè p. 81. l. 1. dele in. p. 140. 1. 6. dele be. p. 182. l. 15. r. those. p. 253. 1. 2. r. brief. p. 256. 1. 20. r. to. p. 270. Marg. I. penult. r. ab eodem imperatore Romam eft. p. 274. Marg. I. 9.r. cultúque p. 318. 1. 25. r. Dei.