Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

44. CASE II. To reduce improper fractions to whole or mixed quantities.

RULE. Divide the numerator by the denominator, as far as an integral quotient can be obtained ; then write the remainder for the numerator, and the former denominator for the denominator of the fraction.

12a2 +42-3c EXAMPLE. Reduce

4a

3c

[ocr errors]

a

a

[ocr errors]

2

12a2+40–30

=30+1 4a

4a Here 12ao divides by 4a, and gives an integral quotient, so also does 4a divided by 4a; but 3c will not give an integral quotient when divided by 4a, therefore it is written as a fraction at the end with its proper sign.

3ax-22 1. Reduce to a mixed quantity. Ans. 3x—** 4x2+3a

За 2. Reduce to a mixed quantity. Ans. 4x+

10a+b+2a2_362 3. Reduce

to a mixed quantity. 2a

362

Ans. 5b+112a4_62°+9a? 4. Reduce

to an integral form. 3a

Ans. 4ao_2a+3. 23 +3x+a+3xa? +23 5. Reduce 22 +2xata? to an integral form.

Ans. x + a. 45. LEMMA. To find the greatest common measure of two algebraic quantities; that is, the greatest quantity that will divide them both without leaving a remainder.

RULE. Arrange the quantities according to the powers of the same letter, as in division, then divide that which contains the highest power of that letter by the other, and the last divisor by the remainder continually, till there be no remainder, the last divisor used is the greatest common

2a

measure.

NOTE 1. If all the terms of one of the quantities be divisible by any simple quantity which does not divide every term of the other, since it cannot form a part of the common measure, it may be struck

X

out of all the terms by dividing by that simple quantity before the general division is performed.

NOTE 2. If the coefficient of the leading term of the dividend be not divisible by the coefficient of the leading term of the divisor, every term of the dividend may be multiplied by such a number as will make its coefficient divisible by that of the divisor without remainder; by this means fractions are avoided.

NOTE 3. Place the quantities in two columns, so that the one which is to be the divisor may stand in the left hand column, and the other in the right; then divide the right hand column by the left, and place the quotient after the right hand column; then divide the left hand column by the remainder, (reduced, if necessary, by Note 1), and place the quotient before the left hand column ; proceed in this manner till there be no remainder.

EXAMPLE. Required the greatest common measure of the quantities xo + 2axta®, and x3-aox. Xota 1 x 2 + 2ax +a 35-a2a

X2 + ax 33 + 2ax + aRx

axta -2ax? —2a2x by dividing
axtao
or, Xta

by-2ax. 46. The process of finding the greatest common measure can often be much more elegantly performed, by reducing the quantities into factors by the theorems, at the end of multiplication and division; then the product of all the factors that are common to both quantities is the greatest common measure sought. The above example wrought in this way

would be as under,
xs-ax=30(xo-a)=x(x + a)(x—a),

x2 + 2ax +ao =(x+a)(x+a). Thence xta being the only factor common to both, is the greatest common measure.

1. Find the greatest common measure of a4-24, and a3-2aRx+axe-2x5.

Ans. a'+x. 2. Find the greatest common measure of xo +y, and 24 + y-xy5-44.

Ans. x+y. 3. Find the greatest common measure of 48x2 +16x—15, and 24.c3-22.° +17x–5.

Ans. 12x-5. 4. Find the greatest common measure of 26_ao, and 24 +4.c3a +6ca+4xa+ a4.

47. CASE III. To reduce fractions to their lowest terms.

RULE. Divide both numerator and denominator by their greatest common measure, and the quotients will be the fraction in its lowest terms.

2:3_a 2 EXAMPLE. Reduce

to its lowest terms, 23–3x*a+3.ca

Ans. c+a.

3

[ocr errors]

Here it will be found, that x—a is the greatest common measure; therefore we have the following: 303_aRx +(2-a)

2*+az

Ans. 23-34-a+3.62-23 ; (x—a) 22-2axtado axt.

atx 1. Reduce to its lowest terms. Ans. 3b2-CX

36-0

x+c 2. Reduce

to its lowest terms. Ans. -2cx+c2

a* +4ax+422 3. Reduce

to its lowest terms. ai_4ax

a+2x Ans.

a _2ax me-n4 4. Reduce

to its lowest terms. ma + na m4_2m+na+n4

Ans. 4x2_12ax+9a

man* 5. Reduce

to its lowest terms. 823—27a3

23-3a Ans.

4.x2 +ar+9a 48. CASE IV. To reduce fractions with different denominators, to equivalent ones having a common denominator.

Rule 1. Multiply both numerator and denominator of each fraction by the product of the denominators of all the others; the resulting fractions will have a common denominator.

RULE 2. Multiply the terms of each fraction by the quotient arising from dividing the least common multiple of all the denominators by its denominator; the resulting fractions will have the least common denominator,

49. Note. The least common multiple of several quantities is the least uantity that is divisible by each of them, without leaving a remainder. It may be found by resolving each of the quantities into its simplest factors, and then multiplying together all the separate factors that appear in the whole, using the highest power of each that appears in any one quantity. For example, let us find the least common multiple of (23—a?)=(x2+xa+a?)(x—a),(22—2ax+a”), =(x—a)?, —a?=(x+a)(x—a), it will be the product of (x2+xa+aj (z–a)"(x+a), because these are all the different factors which appear in the whole, and (x—a) is used in the second power, because it appears in that power in one of them.

3.x 2a EXAMPLE. Reduce to a common denominator

4a' 12x? a and

3.0 By Rule 1, 3.3

3.3

108.23 Х Х

12x 33 1440x2
2a 4a

24a”.x
X
123 4a 3.1 144ax?'

123

4a

3.3

Х

C

Х

=

a

=

Х

4a 127 480
Х Х
4a

12x 144art By RULE 2. The least common multiple of all the denominators is 12ax; therefore the fractions reduced to their least common denominator are

3.3 3.3

9.33
4a 32 12ax'
2a

20%
X
1 2

12ar'
4a 403
32 -40 12ax"

3x 2a

5c 1. Reduce to a common denominator

and 3.0"

9x2 2a 15ac Ans.

Zax' 3ax' 30.1

a- atb ab 2. Reduce to a common denominator

and a+b'ab' (2-6)*z (a+b)*x ab(a) Ans. x)'zx) 5.2

46 3. Reduce to a common denominator

and

a'a+b'o 3.x

5bx(a2—62) 3a+bx3ab2x 4a2b2+4ab3 3a’r-300r Ans. 16 ab(a?–62) abla_62) ab(a2_62) abla_69) ·

7a 3x 4. Reduce to their least common denominator

a

[ocr errors]

' (قده) (ab) (لانه)

atra

[ocr errors]

4ax

7a2_7ax 3ax +3.2* 4ax and

Ans.
a222 agus a 22.

atb 5. Reduce to their least common denominator

a

ä-2c

2a atb

a2_62 2a - 2ab atb and

Ans. -_2ab+68

(a-6)** (a-b) (a-6)**

a+ca-C 6. Reduce to a common denominator

and

aac ac a%c+ac ac-q_2ac Ans.

a2c2 aac2 a®c®

ac

[ocr errors]

ADDITION OF ALGEBRAIC FRACTIONS. 50. RULE. Reduce the fractions to a common denominator; then add their numerators, and under the sum write their common denominator; the fraction so formed will be the fraction required.

[ocr errors]

a

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

с

a

EXAMPLE. Add together the following fractions: 4 b a? +62

atb' and

Here the least common denominator of all the fractions is a'-; hence the fractions become as-ab ab +62 a® +62

and their sum and 2-12 at 62

is therefore 24 +262 a — 6% 1. Add together and

ab6c* 7

abe atb

202 +26% 2. Add together

and

Ans.
a-6
a+b'

as-62 af tax

a2+x2 3. Add together

and a tax+

a_

2a4a2c+a+co Ans.

a-23

2.x2 4. Add together and

Ans.
X+4

22_16*

15 5. Add together and Ans.

2' 3' ' 69

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

a

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

a

a

a

129, or lfa.

a

SUBTRACTION OF ALGEBRAIC FRACTIONS.

51. RULE. Reduce the fractions to a common denominator, then take the difference of the numerators, under which write the common denominator, and the result will be the fraction required.

26 EXAMPLE. From take Here the fractions re

47

За

3a2 862 duced to a common denominator are and there

12ab

3a2_862 fore their difference is

12ab
atx
2'

2

33 2. From take

Ans. 4.

20"

2c 3. From take

Ans. a+

a2c

12abi

Ans. &.

42

5

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
« AnteriorContinuar »