A Books latly Printed Continuation and Vindication of the Defence of Dr Stilling fleet's Unreasonableness of Separation, in Answer to Mr. Baxter, and Mr. Lob, &c. Confiderations of prefent use, confidering the Danger Refulting from the Change of our Church-Government. 1. A Perfwafive to Communion with the Church of England. 2. A Refolution of fome Cafes of Confcience, which Respect Church-Communion. 3. The Cafe of Indifferent things, ufed in the Worfhip of God, Propofed and Stated by confidering these Questions,&c. 4. A Difcourfe about Edification. 5. The Refolution of this Cafe of Confcience, Whether the Church of England's Symbolizing fo far as it doth with the Church of Rome, makes it unlawful to bold Communion with the Church of England? 6. A Letter to Anonymus, in Answer to his Three Letters to Dr. Sherlock about Church-Communion. 7. Certain Cafes of Confcience refolved, concerning the Lawfulness of joyning with Forms of Prayer in Publick Worfhip. In two Parts. 8. The Cafe of Mixt Communion. Whether it be Lawful to separate from a Church upon the Account of promiscuous Congregations, and Mixt Communions? 9. An Answer to the Diffenters Objections against the Common Prayers, and fome other Parts of Divine Service Prefcribed in the Liturgy of the Church of England. 10. The Cafe of Kneeling at the Holy Sacrament, Stated and Refolved, &c. The first Part. II. Certain Cafes of Confcience, &c. The Second Part. 12. A Difcourfe of Profiting by Sermons, and of going to hear where Men think they can profit most. 13. A Serious Exhortation, with fome Important Advices, relating to the late Cafes about Conformity, Recommended to the prefent Diffenters from the Church of England. 1. A Discourse about the charge of Novelty upon the Reformed Church of England, made by the Papisft asking of us the Question, Where was our Religion before Luther? 2. A Discourse about Tradition, fhewing what is meant by it; and what Tradition is to be received, and what Tradition is to be rejected. Clasett, William THE DIFFERENCE Of the CASE, Between the Separation of Proteftants from the Church of Rome, And the Separation of Diffenters from the Church of England. By Dr Clagett. LONDON, Printed for Thomas Basset at the George in Fleetstreet, and Fincham Gardiner at the White Horfe in LudgateStreet. 1683. 9 3-20-50 EES The Difference of the Cafe, between the Separation of Proteftants from the Church of Rome, and the Separation of Diffenters from the Church of England. S Ince the happy Reformation of this Church, they of the Romish Perswasion have with their utmost Art infinuated,that our Reformation proceeded upon Principles Destructive of all Order and Government in the Church; and that it naturally tends to endless Separations. To this end they have laid hold upon that advantage which the Divifions amongst Proteftants have offered them, and faid that the Reasons upon which we ground our Separation from the Church of Rome will hold to justify the Separation of the Diffenters from the Church of England. And the Truth is fome of the Dif fenters have been fo Indifcreet, to fay no more, as to alledge the fame thing. And I am very forry that Men of the fame Perfwafion with us in Oppofition to the Impious Errors and Practices of the Roman Church, fhould give fo much Countenance to that grievousCharge upon the Reformation,as fome of them have done. The Papifts are too much beholden to them for giving the Occafion of this Accufation: but to joyn with them in the fame Charge, is too great a kindness in all Reafon, and indeed Destructive of the Common Caufe B of MM |