Imágenes de páginas

as th' immortal, th' expreffive, th.amazing, th' honeft, &c. and fometimes before an afpirated when an e, follows it; as th' heroic, &c. but elifions of this laft kind are not to be commended.

Sometimes the o in who, and the y in by, is cut off before words beginning with a vowel; as wh' expose, for who expofe; b' oppreffion, for by oppreffion and other contractions of this kind are to be met with in fome of our poets; but fuch a liberty is by no means to be indulged.


The pronoun his fometimes lofes its first letters after words ending with a vowel; as to's, by's, for to his, by bis; and after feveral words that end with a confonant; as in's, for's, for in his, for his, &c. But this is rather to be obferved than imitated.

These are the elifions and contractions moft ufually made in our verfification; the reft may be learnt by reading our beft modern poets; for the liberties taken by fome of our antient ones are not to be encouraged..

There are a few more particulars relating to this fubject that are worth obferving. In the first place, it may be laid down as a general rule, that whenever one fyllable of a word ends with a vowel, and the next begins with another, these two fyllables in verfe are to be confidered as one only, except when either of the fyllables is the feat of the accent. Thus region, valiant, beauteous, mutual, and fuch like words, are to be reckon'd only as two fyllables in poetry; and fo ambition, familiar, perpetual, prefumptuous, Juperior, and other words of the fame nature, though confifting of four fyllables, are to be ufed in verfe as three.

The words diamond, diadem, violet, and a few others, may be excepted from this rule; which, though accented on the first vowel, are fometimes ufed but as two fyllables.

In general the ear is to be confulted; we must confider how words are pronounced in reading profe, and obferve how they are used by the best poets, and we fhall feldom fail either with refpect to juftnefs of meafure or propriety of contractions. It will very much add to the beauty of our verfe to avoid, as much as poffible, a concourse of clafhing vowels; that is, when one word ends with a vowel and the next begins with another, which occafions what is called an biatus, or gaping, and is very difagree

able to the ear. Mr. Pope has cenfured this fault, and given us an inftance of it in the following line:

Tho' oft the ear the open vowels tire.

For this reafon the e of the particle the is generally cut off (as has been obferved) before words that begin with a vowel.

It is not well to make ufe of feveral words in a verfe that begin with the fame letter, unless it be to fuit the found to the fubject. And obferve, that though verfes confifting wholly of monofyllables are not always to be condemned, (nay, poffibly may be very good) yet they ought to be feldom ufed, a feries of little low words having generally an ill effect in our poetry. Be careful alfo not to make use of expletives, that is, fuch words as contribute nothing to the fenfe, but are brought into the vei fe, merely to fill up the measure, Thefe two laft faults Mr. Pope has taken notice of, and exemplified in the following verfes:

While expletives their feeble aid do join,

And ten low words oft creep in one dull line.

Take care likewife not to end a verfe with an adjective, whofe fubftantive begins the next verfe; and the fame is to be observed with respect to a prepofition, and the words it governs. In fhort, avoid every thing that tends to deftroy that agreeable cadence and harmony which is required in poetry, and of which (after all the rules that can be laid down concerning it) the ear is the most proper judge. Remember, however, that eafy and flowing numbers are not all that is requifite in verfification; for, as the lastmention'd excellent poet obferves,

'Tis not enough no harfhnefs gives offence;

The found muft feem an echo to the fense.

We now proceed to the beauty of thought in poetry, and to give fome farther directions concerning the poetic ftyle.







S we have already treated of thoughts and ftyle in the preceding volume, under the article Rhetoric, this chapter and the enfuing may, perhaps, feem like a repetition, and be thought ufelefs; but it is to be confidered, that though thoughts in poetry and profe differ but little, (except in pieces of fiction) a fublime thought being ftill the fame, whether expreffed in profe or verfe, yet as the diction of poetry is very different from that of profe, and as this volume is intended to stand alone, and to be read difinaly from the other fciences, it will be here necessary to fay fomething on thefe fubjects, which are the foundationof elegance and fublimity.

Thoughts may, not improperly, be called the foundation or body of a poem, or difcourfe; and the ftyle, or diction, the drefs with which they are decorated; for the choiceft and moft brilliant expreffions will be looked upon as mere empty and contemptible founds, unless they are animated with good fenfe and propriety of thought: but on the contrary, a new and beautiful thought will affect us agreeably, though unadorned, because it ftrikes the imagination with its novelty, and carries with it fome degree of information, which it has drawn from truth and nature.

Thoughts are the images of things, as words are the images of thoughts, and they are both, like other pictures and images, to be efteemed or defpifed, as the reprefenta. tion is juft and natural, true or false.

The thoughts we find in the best authors are natural and intelligible; they are neither affected to difplay wit, nor far-fetched to difcover learning; but are fuch as arife, as it were spontaneoufly, out of the fubject treated of, and feem fo infeparable from it, that we cannot conceive how it could have been otherwife exprefs'd with fo much propriety.

Were we inclined to give inftances of falfe and unnatural thoughts, enough might be found in the works of our modern poets, and not a few even among the ancients, espéin Ovid, Lucan and Seneca.

This celebrated paffage in Lucan,

The heav'ns entomb the man that wants an urn, which is apply'd to foldiers that are flain in the field and lie unburied, may, at first view, feem elegant and ingenious; but when we confider that the carcass of a horse, a kite, or a crow is entomb'd in the fame manner, the appearance of wit will fubfide. For wit (in the fenfe it is ufed when apply'd to polite compofition) is elegance of thought, which adds beauty to propriety, and not only pleases the fancy, but informs the judgment.

It is amazing, that one of the beft poets this nation has produced fhould have been the author of the following wretched lines:

Thou shalt not wish her thine, thou shalt not dare
To be fo impudent as to defpair.

There's not a far of thine dares flay with thee,
I'll while thy tame fortune after me.

Thoughts are more or lefs juft and true, as they are more or lefs conformable to their object; and entire conformity is, in this refpeet, what we call the juftnefs of a thought; for thoughts are juft and fit when they perfectly agree with the things they reprefent.

Thoughts in poetry, however, may be juft without being philofophically true; for it is the poet's bufinefs to represent. things not as they are, but as they seem to be. In defcribing the rainbow, for instance, he may with juftnefs dwell on the colours that feem to compofe that beatiful phanomenon, though the philofopher fhould ftand by with his prifm, to prove that the whole of this appearance was occafioned only by the refraction of the rays of light. Nor are metaphors, hyperboles, ironies, or equivocal expreffions, when properly used, nor fiction or fable, any deviation. from this rule of right thinking; for there is a great difference between falfhood and fiction, between that which is really falfe, and that which is only fo in appearance. Tropes, figures, and fictions, when they are of any value, are raised on the foundation of right reafon; they have truth for their bafis, which is recommended and rendered more amiable by thofe airy disguises.

To think juftly, therefore, and to raise beautiful thoughts, it is not fufficient that they have nothing in them falje, for fometimes thoughts may become trivial by being only

When Cicero applauds Craffus on the fubject of his thoughts, after obferving that they were juft and true, he alfo adds, that they were new and uncommon; that besides truth and juftnefs to fatisfy the mind, he had thrown in fomething more to captivate and furprise it. Truth, fays father Bouhours, is to thoughts what foundations are to buildings, it fupports and gives them folidity; but a building which has nothing to recommend it but folidity, will not please those who are skilled in architecture. Befides folidity therefore, magnificence, beauty and delicacy are required; and thefe alfo must find a place in the thoughts of our poems, or they will be ever lifeless and unaffecting. Truth, which on other occafions pleafes though unadorned, requires embellishment here: though this ornament is fometimes no more than placing a thought, otherwife common and ordinary, in a new point of light, and giving it an agreeable turn.

Time stays for no man is a very true and juft thought, but is very plain and common. It is raifed, however, and. made in a manner new by the following turn:

Time in his full career keeps preffing on,
Nor heeds he the entreaties, or commands,
Of the poor peafant, or tyrannic king.

So when you tell a flugga:d that he has loft an hour in the morning, which he can never recover, you tell him the truth, yet there is no beauty or wit in it, because the thought is trite and common; but in Sir ****'s remark on his friend, that he loft an hour in the morning, and ran after it all day, there is wit.

But, as Longinus obferves, it is thofe elevated thoughts, which reprefent nothing but what is great to the mind, that principally heighten and animate our poems. The fublimity and grandeur of a thought will always gratify and transport the foul, if it be juft and conformable to the fubject, but where that conformity is wanting, dignity will' rather difguft than pleafe. To drefs up a mean fubject with pomp and fplendor, is like putting the robes of royalty on a clown, which, inftead of procuring him refpect and efteem, will reduce him to the loweft degree of contempt and ridicule. The thoughts, therefore, as well as the style, must be suitable to the fubject, or the writer will ever mifs of his aim,

« AnteriorContinuar »