Let us suppose that we have : :: :: : found First: in the triangle ABC, the horizontal angle ACB=180° − (A+B) = 180° - 111° 49' 68° 11'. = AB = 672 yards BAC 72° 29' ABC = 39° 20' C'AC 27° 49' C"BC-19° 10'. sin C 68° 11' sin B 39° 20' AB 672 AC 458.79 To find the horizontal distance AC. ar. comp. sin C 68° 11' sin A 72° 29' AB 672 BC 690.28 CC' = To find the horizontal distance BC. ar. comp. CC" 27° 49' 458.79 242.06 In the triangle CAC', to find CC'. Ꭱ ar. comp. : tan C'AC :: AC 19° 10' 690.28 239.93 In the triangle CBC", to find CC". R ar. comp. : tan C"BC :: BC = 0.032275 9.801973 2.827369 2.661617. 0.032275 9.979380 2.827369 2.839024. 0.000000 9.722315 2.661617 2.383932 0.000000 9.541061 2.839024 2.380085. Hence also, CC-CC"242.06-239.93 2.13 yards, which is the height of the station A above station B. 1. Wanting to know the distance between two inaccessible objects, which lie in a direct level line from the bottom of a tower of 120 feet in height, the angles of depres sion are measured from the top of the tower, and are found to be, of the nearer 57°, of the more remote 25° 30': required the distance between the objects. PROBLEMS. 2. In order to find the distance between two trees, A and B, which could not be directly measured because of a pool which occupied the intermediate space, the distances of a third point C from each of them were measured, and also the included angle ACB: it was found that, CB 672 yards, CA 588 yards, ACB 55° 40'; required the distance AB. Ans. 592.967 yards. 3. Being on a horizontal plane, and wanting to ascertain the height of a tower, standing on the top of an inaccessible hill, there were measured, the angle of elevation of the top of the hill 40°, and of the top of the tower 51°; then measuring in a direct line 180 feet farther from the hill, the angle of elevation of the top of the tower was 33° 45'; required the height of the tower. Ans. 83.998. AB 536 yards = Ans. 173.656 feet. B B Ans. 939.527 yards. 5. Wanting to know the horizontal distance between two inacessible objects A F and B, and not finding any station from which both of them could be seen, two points C and D, were chosen E at a distance from each other, equal to 200 yards; from the former of these points A could be seen, and from the latter B, and at each of the points C and D a staff was set up. From a distance CF was measured, not in the direction DC, equal to 200 yards, and from D a distance DE equal to 200 yards, and the following angles taken, APC 33° 45′ and BPC =22° 30': it is required to find the three distances PA, PC, and PB. P B 7. This problem is much used in maritime survey ing, for the purpose of locating buoys and sounding boats. The trigonometrical solution is somewhat tedious, but it may be solved geometrically by the following easy con struction. Let A, B, and C be the three fixed points on shore, and P the position of the boat from which the angles APC 33° 45', CPB=22° 30', and APB=56° 15', have been measured. Subtract twice APC-67° 30' from 180°, and lay off at A and C two angles, CAO, ACO, each equal to half the remainder = 56° 15'. With the point 0, thus determined, as a centre, and OA or OC as a radius, describe the cir cumference of a circle: then, any angle inscribed in the segment APC, will be equal to 33° 45'. Subtract, in like manner, twice CPB 45°, from 180°, and lay off half the remainder = 67° 30', at B and C, determining the centre Q of a second circle, upon the cireumference of which the point P will be found. The required point P will be at the intersection of these two eircumferences. If the point P fall on the circumference described through the three points A, B, and C, the two auxiliary circles will coincide, and the problem will be indeterminate. = ANALYTICAL PLANE TRIGONOMETRY. 40. WE have seen (Art. 2) that Plane Trigonometry explains the methods of computing the unknown parts of a plane triangle, when a sufficient number of the six parts is given. To aid us in these computations, certain lines were employed, called sines, cosines, tangents, cotangents, &c., and a certain connection and dependence were found to exist between each of these lines and the arc to which it belonged. All these lines exist and may be computed for every conceivable arc, and each will experience a change of value where the arc passes from one stage of magnitude to another. Hence, they are called functions of the arc; a term which implies such a connection between two varying quantities, that the value of the one shall always change with that of the other. In computing the parts of triangles, the terms, sine, cosine, tangent, &c., are, for the sake of brevity, applied to angles, but have in fact, reference to the arcs which measure the angles. The terms when applied to angles, without reference to the measuring arcs, designate mere ratios, as is shown in Art. 88. 41. In Plane Trigonometry, the numerical values of these functions were alone considered (Art. 13), and the arcs from which they were deduced were all less than 180 degrees. Analytical Plane Trigonometry, explains all the processes for computing the unknown parts of rectilineal triangles, and also, the nature and properties of the circular functions, together with the methods of deducing all the formulas which express relations between them. |