present tract. The fenfe of deity in dark times has indeed been ftrangely distorted, by certain biaffes and paffions that enflave the rude and illiterate but these yield gradually to the rational faculty as it ripens, and at last leave religion free to found philofophy. Then it is, that men, listening to the innate sense of deity purified from every bias, acquire a clear conviction of one fupreme Deity who made and governs the world. The foregoing objection then weighs not against the sense of deity more than against the moral fenfe. If it have weight, it refolves into a complaint against Providence for the weakness of the fenfe of deity in rude and illiterate nations. If fuch complaint be folidly founded, it pierces extremely deep: why have not all nations, even in their nafcent state, the fense of deity and the moral fense in purity and perfection? why do they not poffefs all the arts of life without neceffity of culture or experience? why are we born poor and helpless infants, instead of being produced complete in every member, internal and external, as Adam and Eve were? The plan of Providence is far a 1 bove the reach of our weak criticifms: it in with refpect to what we do not know; and every good man will rest satisfied with the following reflection, That we should have been men from the hour of our birth, complete in every part, had it been conformable to the fyftem of unerring Providence. VOL. IV. Y y SECT SE C T. II. Morality confidered as a branch of duty to our Maker. Having travelled long on a rough road, not a little fatiguing, the agreeable part lies before us; which is, to treat of morality as a branch of religion. It was that fubject which induced me to undertake the history of natural religion; a fubject that will afford falutary instruction; and will infpire true piety, if instruction can produce that effect. Bayle ftates a question, Whether a people may not be happy in fociety and be qualified for good government, upon principles of morality fingly, without any fense of religion. The question is ingenious, and may give opportunity for fubtile reafoning; but it is useless, because the fact suppofed cannot happen. The principles of morality and of religion are equally rooted in our nature: they are indeed weak in children and in favages; but they grow up together, and advance toward maturity with equal fteps. Where the moral fense is entire, there must be a sense of religion; and if a man who has no fenfe of religion live decently in fociety, he is more indebted for his conduct to good temper than to found morals. We have the authority of the Prophet Micah, formerly quoted, for holding, that religion, or, in other words, our duty to God, confifts in doing justice, in loving mercy, and in walking humbly with him. The laft is the foundation of religious wor-, fhip, difcuffed in the foregoing fection: the two former belong to the present fection. And if we have gratitude to our Maker and Benefactor, if we owe implicit obedience to his will as our rightful fovereign, we ought not to separate the worship we owe to him, from juftice and benevolence to our fellow-creatures; for to be unjust to them, to be cruel or hard-hearted, is a tranfgreffion of his will, no less grofs than a total neglect of religious worship. "Ma"ster, which is the great commandment "in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou "fhalt love the Lord thy God with all thy "heart, Y y 2 |