Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen HegemonyUniversity of Chicago Press, 1994 - 317 páginas Why does one theory "succeed" while another, possibly clearer interpretation, fails? By exploring two observationally equivalent yet conceptually incompatible views of quantum mechanics, James T. Cushing shows how historical contingency can be crucial to determining a theory's construction and its position among competing views. Since the late 1920s, the theory formulated by Niels Bohr and his colleagues at Copenhagen has been the dominant interpretation of quantum mechanics. Yet an alternative interpretation, rooted in the work of Louis de Broglie in the early 1920s and reformulated and extended by David Bohm in the 1950s, equally well explains the observational data. Through a detailed historical and sociological study of the physicists who developed different theories of quantum mechanics, the debates within and between opposing camps, and the receptions given to each theory, Cushing shows that despite the preeminence of the Copenhagen view, the Bohm interpretation cannot be ignored. Cushing contends that the Copenhagen interpretation became widely accepted not because it is a better explanation of subatomic phenomena than is Bohm's, but because it happened to appear first. Focusing on the philosophical, social, and cultural forces that shaped one of the most important developments in modern physics, this provocative book examines the role that timing can play in the establishment of theory and explanation. |
Contenido
Theory Construction and Selection | 1 |
12 Theory choice rational but not unique | 5 |
Formalism Interpretation and Understanding | 9 |
22 Explanation versus understanding | 10 |
23 Examples from physics | 12 |
24 Some attempts at understanding quantum phenomena | 16 |
25 Contingently necessary conditions for understanding | 18 |
Appendix A derivation of the EPRB correlations | 22 |
Early Attempts at Causal Theories A Stillborn Program | 124 |
81 Madelung | 125 |
82 De Broglie | 126 |
83 Einstein | 128 |
84 Kennard Rosen Furth | 129 |
85 Von Neumanns proof | 131 |
Appendix 1 Madelungs derivation | 135 |
Appendix 2 De Broglies guidance argument | 136 |
Standard Quantum Theory | 24 |
32 The formalism | 26 |
33 The interpretation | 27 |
34 Complementaritywaveparticle duality | 32 |
35 Perennial problems | 34 |
Appendix A specific illustration of the measurement problem | 40 |
Bohms Quantum Theory | 42 |
42 New insights | 47 |
43 Is there complete observational equivalence? | 53 |
44 Various types of nonlocality | 56 |
Appendix 1 Some technical details of Bohms program | 60 |
Appendix 2 Quantum tunneling times | 72 |
Alternative Interpretations An Illustration | 76 |
52 Neutron interferometry experiments | 78 |
53 The story told by Bohm | 82 |
Appendix 1 The quantum mechanics of spin flipping | 85 |
Appendix 2 A causal interpretation of the Pauli equation | 91 |
Opposing Commitments Opposing Schools | 96 |
62 The Forman thesis | 97 |
63 Predilections not uniquelysolely determining | 101 |
64 The wavemechanics route | 103 |
65 The matrixmechanics route | 107 |
Competition and Forging Copenhagen | 113 |
72 Copenhagen succeeds | 118 |
Appendix Paulis 1927 criticism of de Broglies theory | 122 |
Appendix 3 Einsteins 1927 hiddenvariables theory | 139 |
Appendix 4 Von Neumanns unwarranted assumption | 140 |
The Fate of Bohms Program | 144 |
92 Continued hostility and general disinterest | 152 |
93 Subsequent work | 158 |
94 Some recent developments since 1980 | 162 |
Appendix 1 Nelsons equations | 169 |
Appendix 2 Valentinis Htheorem | 171 |
An Alternative Scenario? | 174 |
102 A Bell theorem | 176 |
103 Einstein and nonlocality | 179 |
104 Fertility and growth | 186 |
Appendix 1 A simple derivation of Bells theorem | 193 |
Appendix 2 The nosignaling theorem | 195 |
Appendix 3 Scalar causal quantum field theory | 196 |
Lessons | 199 |
112 Contingency and scientific theories | 203 |
113 Determinism and indeterminism equivalent? | 207 |
114 So finally | 214 |
Notes | 217 |
References | 273 |
Author Index | 301 |
307 | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony James T. Cushing Vista previa limitada - 1994 |
Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony James T. Cushing Sin vista previa disponible - 1994 |
Términos y frases comunes
actual appendix argument atomic basic beam Bell's theorem Bohm and Hiley Bohm's theory Bohmian mechanics Bohr Bohr's Broglie Broglie's causal interpretation chapter claim complementarity concept configuration space Copenhagen interpretation correlations Cushing David Bohm determinism deterministic discussion Dürr Einstein electron empirical energy ensemble EPRB equivalence essentially experiment explanation formalism of quantum given Goldstein Heisenberg hidden variables hidden-variables initial interaction interpretation of quantum Jammer Kaloyerou laws logical Madelung mathematical matrix mechanics measurement microsystem motion Neumann's neutron nonlocality observed ontology paper particle Pauli Pauli equation phase phenomena philosophical physicists pilot-wave position possible predictions principle probability problem quan quantum equilibrium quantum mechanics quantum potential quantum theory realist result Schrödinger equation scientific theory Solvay congress space-time spin standard quantum mechanics statistical stochastic subsystem superposition theorem tion trajectories underdetermination Valentini vector velocity version of quantum Vigier wave function wave mechanics wave packet Zanghi
Referencias a este libro
The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure, and Darwinism ... Geoffrey Martin Hodgson Sin vista previa disponible - 2004 |
Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal J.T. Cushing,Arthur Fine,S. Goldstein Vista previa limitada - 1996 |