« AnteriorContinuar »
all the services of it at an end. Since there is a change in the priesthood, “there is made of necessity a change also of the law;'* in all the parts of it which respected the priesthood...
3. So far as the law is of a local character, it must be understood to be abolished. It pleased God to plant his Israel in a particular territory ; by which they were locally separated from the other parts of the world. In consequence of this appointment, the tribes were territorially distributed, and had their precise boundaa ries. The tabernacle, and afterwards the temple, in which the sacrifices were to be offered, where the feasts were to be kept, and the worship of God was publicly celebrated, had a fixed place. The law, so far as it is of this character must have ceased to oblige, since an end has been put to this territorial establishment. The laws respecting leprosy, ceremonial purifications, things clean and unclean, clothing, tythes, first fruits, general convocations, &c. seem to be of this class.
4. That part of the law which may be considered as governmental, i. e. which respected the ordering of the society, must be understood to belong to the law which is abolished. There was a species of government in Israel somewhat resembling the arrangements of ora dinary ciyil government. This might not improperly be called the economy of the society. There was a council of seventy erected by divine appointment.-There were rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens. These were de nominated judges. The priesthood was invested with an authority peculiar to itself. To this authority the people were to repair in questions of diffioulty. In controversies between man and man, the judges were to preside as arbitrators. There were besides, rules determining who should act as soldiers in the camp, the manner of carrying on war, and the treatment of captives. Under this head may be classed also those directions which related to the alienation and redemp tion of property, inheritances, personal wrongs, frauds, and marriages. All these laws, and this econ. omy, had evident respect to Israel, a's occupying the land of promise, and were of a subordinate nature. When Israel ceased to occupy this land ; and was en: tirely new modified under the direction of Christ, these faws necessarily lost their authority. They cannot be obligatory upon christians in these days, nor determine the manner in which the christian church is to be governed. One great object of the Messiah's appearing, was to order and establish his kingdom forever. How he ordered it in this respect, we are to learn, not from the law which preceded; but from the appointments which followed...
* Hebrews vii. 12. ..
5. That which may be considered as the penal part of the Mosaic institute, must be of that law which is abolished. No part of this penal code appears to have an establishment in the New Testament. It was 'evi. dently a system appropriate to the dispensation which preceded Christ's coming, and that state of the church which precluded the control of ordinary civil government. The covenant making no provision for the aca tual sanctification of all the visible members of the society, the entire moral purity of it was not secured. It was supposed, of course, that overt crimes might be committed, and that wrongs might be done. It was necessary that motives resulting from the exercise of immediate retributive justice, should be presented to prevent them. It was nécessary that their influence should be counteracted, when committed. It was no less proper therefore, that the church should have the power of life and death in its hands, than that the civit magistrate should. If capital punishment be necessary in the one case, it might be in the other. The church is now in an entirely different condition from what it was at that period. It exists in a dispersed, moveable state, among the civil governments of the world. The penal law is now inapplicable to its condition. The ultimate exercise of power among christians, by the express direction of Christ, is confined to this.. “* Lét him be unto thee, as an heathen man, and a publican."?
Other sorts of punishment can be inflicted by the civil magistrate only...
It is not to be understood that all the positive precepts of the Old Testament belonged peculiarly to the Sinai covenant. The sabbath, circumcision, and the Passover, were positive institutions, and obligatory by positive precepts. It has appeared that these were es. tablished before the Sinai covenant was introduced. The prohibition of the use of blood, as food, was given before this covenant was established. This law, with that which respeéts fornication, has an express confirmation in the New Testament. The law which forbade the children of Israel to intermarry with the idol. atrous people around them, seems to be a law which is attached to the church through every period of its ex. istence. Accordingly this also has an express confir. mation in the New Testament. The laws in favor of the manumission, and kind treatment of servants, are evidently founded in humanity; and so far as they are, may be considered as explanatory of the general prin ciple taught by Christ; "And whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, thắt do ye also to them.” The laws respecting usury and pledges, are plainly implied in the generat christian law of brotherly love. To all duty of this kind, that precept of our Savior extends ; “But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again.”
These precepts do not come under either of those characters which have been given to the abolished law.
Upon a general comparison of the two dispensations, that which preceded, and that which followed Christ, it is evident that in their moral nature, they are precise: ly the same. The one is not more spiritual than the other. The moral law has the same authority in both. Both are alike founded in grace: And the qualifica. tions for membership are the same in the one which they are in the other. The only considerable difference which is to be observed, seems to be in the form, which the church, under the latter dispensation has as. sumed, and the great augmentation of light, and gra
cious influences which it has enjoyed. The Gospel has undoubtedly brought to the world a vast addition of light. The fulfilment of prophecies and promises, in a series of facts, has confirmed the truth of scrip. ture testimony, and shewn more clearly to mankind the nature of the marvellous work of redemption. It has illustrated the glory of Jehovah's character, and brought life and immortality more clearly into view. It has multiplied motives to piety, and greatly increased the number of the subjects of it. The spirit is giv. en in more plentiful effusions, and grace is more triumphant. But it has been shewn that this increase of light and grace, cannot be drawn into an argument against the identity of the Jewish and Christian church, Differences, as great in these respects, are observable in particular periods of the last dispensation. The dif. ference between the states of the chureh in the elev. enth, and the sixteenth centuries, is at least as great as is to be observed between the two dispensations generally. And the difference between its present state, and that which is approaching, in the ingathering of the Jews with the fulness of the Gentiles, must be greater still.
This very interesting event, which is a leading sub. ject of the faith and prayers of all the people of God, so far as it falls within the plan of this treatise, we will next briefly consider, ..
Respecting the conversion of the rejected Jews, their restoration
to the land, secured to them in the covenant, and the ingathering of the fullness of the Gentiles ; which events are to introduce the millennial glory.
IT may have been an objection in the mind of the reader to the theory which has been exhibited, that the posterity of Abraham have, in fact, been cast out for centuries, from the land of Canaan. This objeca tion, which has considerable plausibility, ought to be obviated. It cannot be obviated, unless it can be made to appear, that the posterity of Abraham either do, or are yet to possess this land, according to covenant. It was given them, as'an unalienble possession, by will. If it has been enjoyed but for a time, and this under great interruptions, and it is never again to come into their possession, some embarrassment will seem to attend the scheme which has been advanced.. ' ! Though interpretations of prophecy, not yet fulfilled, must always be in some measure doubtful; yet it is to be presumed, God has so far instructed us into the manner in which the covenant is to be executed, that no insuperable objection can lie against it.
It has appeared that the covenant absolutely secured a succession of pious persons, in the posterity of Abra. ham, constituting the seed, in the proper, literal sense of that term ; and that of these, as heirs by natural descent, the kingdom of Christ primarily consists.
Such a succession must be supposed therefore in the Christian Church; though, since the distinction between Jew and Gentile is done away, we are inca. pable of pointing them out, as such. Our not being able to do this, is certainly not inconsistent with the supposed fact, that such a succession has taken place.