432 Sect. 170. 19. 20 21 22 He tells them, One at the Table with him would betray him. 19 Now I tell you before come to pafs, ye may believe it come, that when it is that I am he. 20 Verily, verily I fay unto you, He that receiveth whomfoever I fend, receiv eth me: and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that And this I tell you now, before it comes to pass, Now when Jefus had thus faid, he made a 21 When Jefus had thus faid, [-2 The Devil havHeart of Judas Iscariot, Siing now put it into the mon's Son, to betray him ;] he was troubled in Spirit, did eat, Jefus] teftified, and and [MAR. as they fat, and faid, Verily, verily I fay unto you, that one of you [MAR. which eateth with me] fhall betray me; [LUK. and behold, the Hand of him that betrayeth me, is with XXVI. 21. MARK XIV. 18.LUKE XXII, 21. JOHN XIII, —2. ] 22 Then the Difciples Then the Difciples were exceedingly grieved, to hear of his being betrayed at aH, and much [were exceeding forrowful, more to be told that it fhould be by one of their own and] John privately afks JESUS, who it was. and] looked one on another, doubting of whom he spake: [LUK. and they began to enquire among themselves, which of them it was that fhould do this Thing;] [and began every one of them to fay unto him [MAR. one by one, 1 Lord, is it I?] [MAT. XXVI. 22. MARK XIV. 19. LUKE XXII. 231 22. 433 own Number, while, no one being fingled out Sect. 170. 23 24 Now one of his Difciples, namely, John, whom made (d) To fay to him, one by one, Lord, is it I?] I look on this as a strong Proof, that the Facts mentioned John xiii. 23,-26. did not happen a Night or two before; for if Chrift had then privately marked out Judas to John and Peter as the Traitor, the Information muft furely have reached the reft of the Company by this Time. (e) Beckoned to him with a Motion of his Head.] This is certainly the Import of the Word vues, which might more exactly be rendered nodded. VOL. II. Iii (ƒ) In 25 434 John XIII. 26. 23. 27.p.435 Judas I MAT. XXVI. 23. And he answered and faid [unto. them, It is one of the his Hand with me in the Twelve,] He that dippeth Difh, the fame fhall betray me. [MARK XIV. 20.] He points out Judas as the Man, by giving him a Sop: Sect. 170. made of Dates, Raifins, and other Ingredients Sop, he gave it to cariot, the Son of Simon. beaten together, and properly diluted (ƒ), he gave it to Judas Iscariot, the Son] of Simon, putting it towards that Part of the Dish which was nearest Mat. XXVI. him, and directing it towards him. Upon which Judas put forth his Hand to take it; and while he was juft in this Pofture, others continuing the Question, Jefus answered and faid to them, [It is] one of the Twelve, [even] be that now dippeth his Hand with me in the Dish, this 24 very Perfon shall betray me (g). And let him not vainly hope, that I fhall exert my miraculous Power to rescue myself from the Hands of mine Enemies, after he has delivered me to them, and fecured to himself the Wages of Unrighteoufnefs; for the Son of Man, great and powerful as he will finally appear, is indeed going to Sufferings and Death (b), as it is written in the Scriptures, [and] determined in the Divine Counfels concerning him (i): But as thofe Prophecies and Counfels 24 The Son of Man [indeed] goeth, as it is written [LUK. and determined] of him: (f) In a thick Kind of Sauce, made of Dates, &c.] The Jews ftill retain such a Sauce, which they call Charofeth, made of fuch Kind of Ingredients, about the Confistence of Mortar, to reprefent the Clay in which their Forefathers wrought, while under the Egyptians. See Buxt. Synag. Jud. cap. 18. and the Religious Ceremonies of all Nations, Vol. i. pag. 215. (g) He that dippeth his Hand with me in the Difh.] Some very ingenious Perfons imagine, that Chrift by this Phrafe only declares, it was one who fate on the fame Side of the Table with him, and fo eat out of the fame Difh: And if it were fo, there might feem a Gradation in the Difcovery, not obfervable on any other Interpretation. But (not to infift upon it, that the Lamb, which was to be roafted whole, was alfo to be served up in one Dish,) I cannot but conclude, that if this had been our Lord's Meaning, as he fays in the fame Breath, es ex Toy Sadexa, one of the Twelve, he would alfo have faid, as ex Tay EμCOTTOμEVER, one of thefe that dip, and not o subaquevos, which plainly fignifies that Perfon that dippeth. (b) The Son of Man is indeed going.] As we often in common Speech fay, a Perfon is going or gone, to intimate that he is dying or dead, fo Elfner fhews, (Obferv. Vol. i. pag. 119.) that the Word vrayes has the fame Ambiguity. Compare Joh. xxiii. 14. and Pfal. xxxix. 13.-The Repetition of that Title of the Son of Man, which is twice ufed here in the fame Verfe, has a peculiar Energy and Dignity, not commonly observed. (i) As it is determined.] As this Paffage is not liable to the Ambiguities, which fome have apprehended in Acts ii. 23. and iv. 28. (which yet feem, on the whole, to be parallel to it in their most natural Construction,) I look upon it as an evident Proof, that those Things are in the Language of Scripture faid to be determined, or decreed, (or exactly bounded and marked out by GOD, as the Word we moft naturally fignifies,) which he fees will in Fact happen, in Confequence of his Volitions, without any neceffitating Agency; as well as thofe Events, of which he is properly the Author; (and, as Beza well expreffes it, Qui fequitur Deum, emendate fane loquitur, we need not fear falling into any Impropriety of Speech, when we ufe the Language which GOD has taught: ) I fay, without any neceffitating Agency, becaufe I apprehend that this Text, among many others, muft entirely overthrow the Scheme, which Mr. Colliber (in his Enquiry into the Divine Exiftence, pag. 97,--102.) has fo laboriously endeavoured to establish; and which the Author of the Perfian Letters from And afterwards reveals the Traitor to them all. 435 Mat. XXVI. Counfels have no Influence to deftroy the free Sect. 170. Then Judas, who was indeed the Perfon that 25 And after he was thus exprefsly marked out, John XIII, Time. from Paris, (Let. lvi.) fo confidently afferts, "That where GOD forefees an Event, he "always determines to render it neceffary, and fo to fufpend the Moral Agency and "Accountableness of the Creature concerned in it." Were this the Cafe, nothing could be more unjuft, (on the Principles of thefe Authors,) than to foretell Punishments to be inflicted for fuch Actions; which is plainly the Cafe here, and indeed in most other Places, where Evil Actions are foretold. (k) Thou haft faid right.] This is plainly the Import of the Original Phrafe: It is as thou haft fpoken. (See Mat. xxvi. 63,-65. Mark xiv. 61, 62. Luke xxii. 70. John xviii. 37.) Thus, Now you fay fomething, fignifies among us, You speak right. (1) After the Sop.] It feems very unnatural to apprehend with Dr. Reynolds, (in his. Works, pag. 101, 102.) that Judas was encouraged by Chrift's giving him the Sop, to hope Chrift would, after all, provide for his own Safety, and admit him into Favour again. Chrift's Words above exprefsly cut off all fuch Hope; and I believe every Reader will judge the common Account given of the Connection much more probable. Iii 2 (m) Which 436 Sect. 170. Time. John XIII. 28. Judas goes away to execute his But the Reference being thus particular to what none of the Company but himfelf was privy to, no Man at the Table knew what was his Meaning, or for what Purpose he spoke 29 this to him. For fome [of them] thought, becaufe Judas had the keeping of the common Purfe, on which they were to fubfift during their Stay at Jerufalem, that it was as if Jefus had faid to him, Take the first Opportunity to buy thofe Sacrifices, and other Things, which we shall need for the Feaft To-morrow, and on the following Days (m); or that perhaps he intended, he should give fomething to the Poor, which Chrift ufed to do, tho' their Stock was fo fmall; but always did it in a very private Manner, which made it the more probable, that he should only give fuch an oblique Hint of that Intention. Of this they thought, rather than of any bad Defign of Judas; for they did not imagine, that, if he was to prove the Traitor, his Wickedness could immediately take Place; or that he was fo utterly abandoned, as to go away to accomplish it, with thofe awful Words of his Mafter founding, as it were, in his Ears. 30 But he was capable of committing the Crime, even with this Aggravation; and therefore having, as was faid, received the Sop, he immediately went out without any farther Reply. And as it was Night, which was the Time he had appointed to meet those who were confulting the Death of Jefus, under the Covert of it he went to them, and fulfilled his Engagements in a few Hours after, by delivering his Master into their Hands. (m) Which we shall need for the Feaft.] This is one of the Paffages, which has led Grotius, and other confiderable Criticks, to conclude, that our Lord kept the Paffover at least one Day fooner than the reft of the Jews. The Controverfy is too large to be critically difcuffed here: I content myself with referring to Dr. Whitby's excellent Differtation on the Subject, (in his Appendix to Mark xiv.) only obferving, that the Suppofition of Chrift's anticipating the Day appointed by the Law is fo improbable, that I think it more reafonable to fuppofe, that the Word Feaft, or Paffover, may fignify the Offerings attending the whole Feaft, and particularly thofe prefented on the first Day of unleavened Bread; which is certainly the Senfe of the Word elsewhere. (See Deut. xvi. 2. and 2 Chron. xxxv. 7,-9.) And if this be admitted, it will obviate the most plaufible Argument for Grotius's Opinion, which is that taken from John xviii. 28. Others grounded on John xiii. 1, 2. xix. 14. and Mat. xxvi. 5. are obviated in the Paraphrafe, or Notes, on thofe Places, as the attentive Reader will eafily perceive. IMPROVE |