Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Lu.xxjii.55. lee, followed after, and beheld the sepulchre, and how Jerusalem.

the body was laid.
may have kept the two parties asunder, as long as we suppose it
requisite.

Let us but consider the situation of certain places in Jerusa-
lom, and we shall find it not only possible, but probable, that
these things should have fallen out as they have been stated;
and indeed that they could not well have happened otherwise,
if we may rely on a map of that city, not of arbitrary construc-
tion, but compiled from ancient documents. In Zebedee's
houso, Salome, whether then his wife or widow, would abide
with her son St. Joha. It stood very near to that which the
map of Dr. Townson, which is here referred to, calls the
Dung-gate; whicle opened the voarost way to the sepulchre
from that part of the town. In this house would be deposited
the spices prepared on the preceding evening by her, Mary
Magdalene, and the other Mary, as the most convenient place
from wbich they might be taken to the sepulchre. Her friends,
the two Maries, who had staid at the sepulchre by themselves
on Friday evening, probably lodged together, perhaps in an
interior part of the city, at least more remote from the Dung-
gate, and on that account went forth before it was clear day-
light, that they might be in good time at Zebedee's house :
from wbich, when all things were ready, they and Salome pro-
ceeded to the sepulchre, so as to be there at the rising of the
sun. The lodgings of Joanna, whose husband was steward to
Herod, we may tix in or near the palace; the direct way from
which to the sepulchre was through the Gate of the Valley. It
is seen, at once, that this palace and Zebedee's house were in
different quarters of the city. They therefore who started from
either, had little inducement to make such a round, as would
be necessary to call at the other; when it was supposed they
would all meet at the sepulchre.

The map of Dr. Townson shows also, that the distance from Herod's palace to the sepulchre was at least twice as much as from Zebedee's house. If, therefore, the three women that went from the latter to the sepulchre, and reached it about six, were half an hour in going, they who set out from the palace, at the same rate of walking, twice the distance, would be there balf an hour later. But we can hardly believe them to bave been thus expeditious, as to have arrived but half an hour after the first party. Early in the morning, us Joanna and one or two of her friends were prepared to set out, they bad to wait for others, who might live at some distance, or not be quite so punctual; and when they were collected, the women of Galilee, and the women of Jerusalem, if any of them were slow walkers, the rest could get on no faster, if they were to keep together in a body. We may therefore well allow near an hour between the arrivals of the two companies at the sepulchre, and this is amply sufficient for all that is supposed to have happened in the interim.

The errand of the women who had seen an angelic vision, was to the Apostles ; of whom, St. Jobn would dwell in his own house, that had been his father Zebedee's. Nor was St. Peter's far from him, John xxii. 2. To these the women would first repair, as Mary Magdalene had before. And wherever the rest of the Apostles were to be found, unless the path towards their lodgings lay through the gate of the valley, which we have no reason to suppose, the company that first retired from the sepulchre could not meet the other advancing towards it. Herod's palace may be admitted to have been where the map places it. It may soem more questionable, how the site of Ze

[ocr errors]

SECTION III.
The Women from Galilee hasten to return Home before the

Sabbath began, to prepare Spices.

LUKE xxiii. 56.
La.xxiii.56. And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments ; Jerusalem.

bedee's house, originally, we may imagine, an obscure build.
ing, could be recovered, when the whole city bad been razed
to its foundations. But Jerusalem stood on the risings aud
sinkings of very uneven grounds, intersected as well as encom-
passed with walls, the bases of which would remain; and thus
the parts into which it had been distributed, and the contents
of each division, were more easily recollected and ascertained,
than if the like calamity had befallen a city built on a plain.
And the Christians who bad retired to Pella, and the mountains
beyond Jordan, before the siege, being returned to it after its
destruction, would be guided by certain standing marks to the
structures which they had before held in veneration. And to
rebuild them as near as might be in the old places, and call them
again by their old names, might be no unpleasing consolation
to those who were resettled in the fallen city. Nor from the
desolation of Jerusalem to the present day, has the succession
of its Christian inbabitants been ever long interrupted; often
as it has changed its masters, and suffered by its conquerors,
Romans, Persians, Saracens, Mamalucs, and Ottomans. If
fable had added its conceits to traditionary truths in these mat-
ters, yet I do not find that it has interested itself about Zebe-
dee, or told any thing of bim that required his presence, or an
abode for him at Jerusalem. The true reason why a house is
assigned him in it, seems to have been, that he really had one,
the same probably which his son St. John called his own house
(John xix. 27.); it might come to them from thelr ancestors:
and Zebedee, though he resided in Galilee, might feel the usual
reluctance to part with his inheritance, and that in the holy
city. It might even be more valuable to him and his friends, at
the great festivals, and on other occasions, than the price of a
dwelling in such a part of the city.

In order therefore to illustrate this plan, Dr. Townson has
given in his elaborate work a very satisfactory map of Jerusa-
lem, on which we may rely, as it is not one of arbitrary con-
struction, but compiled from ancient documents, by Villalpan.
dus. In this map are distinctly pointed out the site of the bouse
of Zebedee, of St. Mark, of St. James, and St. Thomas.

Villalpandus was a learned Spaniard of Cordova, well known for the commentary on Ezekiel, and designs of Solomon's temple ; and celebrated by many authors of name for his skill and accuracy in these researches. Among other eminent men who had adopted his topography of Jerusalem as the most satisfactory, is Bishop Walton, in his Polyglot.

These four houses that are numbered in Dr. Townson's map, and did not come properly under the consideration of Villalpandus, are from the view of Jerusalem, given by Cotovicus, an eminent civilian of Utrecht, who visited Palestine in the year of our Lord 1598.

Though in this view he sets down the Dung-gate not as it stands in Villalpandus, but as in the present city much changed in situation and shape from its ancient shape; yet he places the houses in question precisely as they are disposed in Villalpandas's map, near to a line by which he distinguishes the course of the wall that divided the old city from Mount Calvary. Herman

La.xxiii.56. apd rested the sabbath-day according to the command- Jerusalem.

ment.

Witsius says of him, that he examined Jerusalem with curious
eyes. And so certainly thought a traveller of great note, who
was there about twelve years after him, our countryman Mr.
George Sandys. For the drawings of Cotovicus, of the temple
of the Holy Sepulchre, and other parts of Jerusalem, are closely
followed in Sandys' travels; and the praise which Mr. Maun-
drell bestows on the latter for exactness in these matters belongs
equally to the other.

The map of Villalpandus, with the addition of the houses from
Cotovicus, illustrates the incidents of the morning of the resur-
rection, as if it was fabricated for that very purpose. And yet
we may venture to affirm, that these learned men had not the
most distant idea of the use to which their designs are appli.
cable. Their notion, it may be presumed, was the same as was
generally entertained, that the women all went to the sepulchre
in one company, which is not particularly favonred by either
place separately; and, when they are thus united, is rather
discountenanced by them; for hence it appears, while all the
women were hastening to the same place, how much time some
of them must lose by going to join the others, for the sake of
setting out with them. The bistory not being framed to tally
with the map, nor the map with the history, their undesigned
agreement adds to the credibility of both.

Leaving, however, all arguments of this nature, let us consider the more authentic evidence derived from the sacred parrative itself, that the women were divided into two parties. These, for the sake of method and clearness, shall be reduced under certain heads.

1. St. Mark's account of the women that went to the tomb on the morning of the resurrection does, in just construction, exclude all but those whom he names.

He speaks of these women, or some of them, in the five fol. lowing places : First, There were also women looking afar off, among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the Less, and of Joses and Salome ; xv. 40. Secondly, And Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses bebeld where be was laid ; ibid. ver. 47. Thirdly, And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Salome, bought sweet spices, that they might go and anoint

xvi. 1. Fourthly, And very early in the morning of the first day of the week they go unto the tomb; ibid. ver. 2. Fifthly, Now Jesus, having risen early the first day of the week, appeared first to Mary Magdalene; ibid. ver, 9.

2. St. Luke's account does not include the women named by St. Mark; it bears tokens of being the description of an entirely distinct company.

In speaking of the women that attended the body of Christ from the cross to the tomb, St. Luke does not say, the women also that came with him from Galilee; but, as we shall find, if we consult the original, “women also that came with him from Galilee,” (Luke xxiii. 55.) there being no article accompany ing yuvaixes; which therefore allows us, with good reason, to conjecture that he intended to comprehend only the majority, not the whole company of these women, in bis subsequent account of them : nor at present does he mention any of them by name. He speaks of them as follows: “And women also that came with him from Galilee followed after, and beheld the tomb, and how his body was laid; and, being returned, prepared spices and ointments."

him;

SECTION IV.

Jerusalem. Mary Magdalene and the other Mary continue to sit oppo

3. The accounts given of the conduct of the women, when they arrived at the tomb, imply a first and second company. And besides the vision to Mary Magdalene alone, there were two angelic appearances and speeches, each to a different set of women, in the tomb.

St. John says, that when Mary Magdalene saw the stone taken away from the tomb, she runneth and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, “ They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we know not where they have laid him,” xx.2. As these words evidently imply that the other women who came to the tomb with. Mary Magdalene, felt the same disappointment and concern with her in the same situation ; so also they clearly shew that, before the women entered the tomb, they were very well assured that the body of Jesus was not in it. They imply another thing : that so early was the arrival of the women at the tomb, that they had not the smallest idea that any of his friends would be there before them to get it open.

But this will receive still greater confirmation from the two subsequent positions.

4. The accounts given of the behaviour of the women in the tomb, are accounts of two different parties.

The women, whom St. Matthew and St. Mark speak of, were affrighted, not only at the first sight of the angel, but after he had done speaking to them. Both Evangelists represent them as hastening away from his presence, by going out quickly, and fleeing from the tomb.

But the women described by St. Luke were calm and composed ; and, if they had recovered such presence of mind wbilo the angels were yet speaking, there is no reason to imagine that, having heard such happy intelligence, they were then seized with a sudden terror, and fled from the tomb trembling and amazed. St. Luke's words certainly convey no such idea of their departure from it.

5. The speech of the two angels considered as spoken to a subsequent company has an obvious propriety.

It would be presumption to affirm antecedently what the two angels ought or ought not to have spoken ; but when we have their speech before us, we may examine and judge, whether the circumstances of it suit better with the whole company of the women, or with one part of them, not exactly in the same situation with the other. If the women did not visit the tomb all together, the going thither of Joanna and her party has been rightly placed, after Mary Magdalene had left it à second time; and then our Lord bad showed himself to her. And but a short space intervened between tbis going thither, and his . meeting the two Maries and Salome, saying unto them, “ All hail!” At this juncture it was that the two angels were addressing themselves to Joanna, and those who had just searched the tomb with her. When therefore Christ was not only risen, but bad appeared in that body which the Father had raised from the grave, it might well be asked of those, who were much perplexed because they found not his body where it had been deposited, “Why seek ye the living among the dead?

in every point of view, then, the division of the women into two distinct companies, going successively to the tomb on the morning of the resurrection, corresponds exactly with the

N n

site the Sepulchre, till it is too late to prepare their
Spices.

MATT. xxvii. 61.
Mtxxvii.61.

And there was Mary Magdalene, and the other Mary, Jerusalem. sitting over against the sepulchre*.

SECTION V.
The Sabbath being ended, the Chief Priests prepare a
Guard of Soldiers to watch the Sepulchre.

MATT. xxvii. 62-66.
Mtxxvii.62. Now the next day, that followed the day of the prepa.

ration, the chief priests and Pharisees came together
unto Pilate,
evangelical accounts the incidents of that morning. It em-
braces all the circumstances related of the women, and of the
angels seen by them, and unites the wbole into one intelligible
consistent bistory.

See, both for this and the subsequent notes on the following
sections, Cranfield's Harmony of the Resurrection, and Dr.
Townson's Discourses, with their references.

* We read, in Matt. xxvii. 59. “And when Joseph had taken the body, he wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, and laid it in his own new sepulchre, which he had hewn out in the rock, and be rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed. And (or But) Mary Magdalene was there, and the other Mary, sitting over against the tomb.” The words seem to imply an opposition between the departing of Joseph, and the abiding of the two women; and that this sitting over against the tomb was subsequent to the closing of it with a great stone. This solemn act could not force them away from the object of their grief. They still lingered as near to it as they could, sitting on the ground. And in this posture of mourning they continued, till reverence for the sabbath obliged them to retire; when it was too late to prepare their contingent of spices.--Dr. Townson, vol. ii. p. 86.

5. This conduct of the Pharisees and Chief Priests compelled them also to become unwilling witnesses of the resurrection of our Lord. The attempt of the women to enter the sepulchre on the morning when he arose, sufficiently proves that they had pot anticipated any other obstacle to the embalming the body, but that which might be occasioned by the size of the stone. They were utterly unprepared to meet with a guard, or to find the seal of the Saobedrim on the tomb. This conduct, however, of the rulers of the people, was attended with many important advantages. They satisfied themselves that the dead body was safoly lying in the tomb, before they proceeded to place the seal. Their testimony, therefore, that our Lord was really dead, must have corroborated in the strongest manner the great truth of the resurrection, and that our Lord had risen, as the Apostles declared; for no common power could have eluded the jealous caution of the rulers, or have escaped the proverbial vigilance of a Roman guard, The sealing the sepulchre also, prevented the violation of the tomb, by any of the guard themselves ; who might bave been tempted to steal the spices in which the body was inclosed.

« AnteriorContinuar »