Reverting this series, Art. 383, Ex. 3, we obtain But, by hypothesis, a*=n=1+m; therefore 1 1 +, etc. +, etc. By taking nine terms of this series, we find a=2.718282, which is the base of Napier's system. 427. The logarithm of a number in any system is equal to the modulus of that system multiplied by the Naperian logarithm of the number. If we designate Naperian logarithms by Nap. log., and logarithms in any other system by log., then, since the modulus of Napier's system is unity, we have where 1+m may designate any number whatever. 428. To render the Logarithmic Series converging.-The formula of Art. 425, can not be employed for the computation of logarithms when m is greater than unity, because the series does not converge. This series may, however, be transformed into a converging series in the following manner: Subtracting Eq. (2) from Eq. (1), observing that log. (1+m) Now, since this is true for every value of m, put 1+m_p+1 1-m p 429. This series converges rapidly, and may be employed for the computation of logarithms in the Naperian or the common systems. It is only necessary to compute the logarithms of prime numbers directly, since the logarithm of any other number may be obtained by adding the logarithms of its several factors. Making p=1, 2, 4, 6, etc., successively, we obtain the following Naperian or Hyperbolic Logarithms. 1 1 1 log. 3=log. 2+2+8.58 +5.50 +7.57+. =0.693147 =1.098612 log. 7=log. 6+213 +3.183 +5.185 +7.137+ 1 1 1 =1.945910 log. 8=3 log. 2 =2.079442 430. To construct a Table of Common Logarithms.—In order to compute logarithms of the common system, we must first determine the value of the modulus. In Art. 427, we found If 1+m=a, the base of the system, then log. a=1, and we have that is, the modulus of any system is the reciprocal of the Naperian logarithm of the base of the system. The base of the common system is 10, whose Naperian logarithm is 2.302585. Hence which is the modulus of the common system. We can now compute the common logarithms by multiplying the corresponding Naperian logarithms by .434294, Art. 427. In this manner was the table on pages 290-1 computed. 431. Results.-The base of Briggs's system is 10. 2.71828. Since, in Briggs's system, all numbers are to be regarded as powers of 10, we have 100.301 — 2, 100.477-3, 100.602-4, etc. In Napier's system, all numbers are to be regarded as powers of 2.71828. Thus, 2.7180.693=2, 2.7181.098=3, 2.7181.386-4, etc. CHAPTER XXI. GENERAL THEORY OF EQUATIONS. 432. A cubic equation with one unknown quantity is an equation in which the highest power of this quantity is of the third degree, as, for example, x-6x2+8x-15=0. All equations of the third degree with one unknown quantity may be reduced to the form x3+ax2+bx+c=0. A biquadratic equation with one unknown quantity is an equation in which the highest power of this quantity is of the fourth degree, as, for example, x2-6x3+7x2+5x-4=0. Every equation of the fourth degree with one unknown quantity may be reduced to the form x2+ax3+bx2+cx+d=0. The general form of an equation of the fifth degree with one unknown quantity is and the general form of an equation of the nth degree with one unknown quantity is x2+Аx2-1+Bxn-2+Сon-3+.... +Tx+V=0. (1.) This equation will be frequently referred to hereafter by the name of the general equation of the nth degree, or simply as Equation (1). An equation not given in this form may be reduced to it by transposing all the terms to the first member, arranging them according to the descending powers of the unknown quantity, and dividing by the coefficient of the first term. In this equation n is a positive whole number, but the coefficients A, B, C, etc., may be either positive or negative, entire or fractional, rational or irrational, real or imaginary. The term V may be regarded as the coefficient of xo, and is called the absolute term of the equation. It is obvious that if we could solve this equation we should have the solution of every equation that could be proposed. Unfortunately, no general solution has ever been discovered; yet many important properties are known which enable us to solve any numerical equation. 433. Any expression, either numerical or algebraic, real or imaginary, which, being substituted for x in Equation (1), will satisfy it, that is, make the two members equal, is called a root of the equation. It is assumed that Eq. (1) has at least one root; for, since the first member is equal to zero, it will be so for some value of x, either real or imaginary, and this value of x is by definition a root. 434. If a is a root of the general equation of the nth degree, its first member can be exactly divided by x-a. For we may divide the first member by x-a, according to the usual rule for division, and continue the operation until a remainder is found which does not contain x. Let Q denote the quotient, and R the remainder, if there be one. shall have -2 Then we +Tx+V=Q(x−α)+R. (2.) Now, if a is a root of the proposed equation, it will reduce the first member of (2) to 0; hence R is also equal to 0. contain x; it is therefore equal to 0, whatever value be attributed to x, and, consequently, the first member is exactly divisible by x-ɑ. it will also reduce Q(x—a) to 0; But, by hypothesis, R does not 435. If the first member of the general equation of the nth degree is exactly divisible by x-a, then a is a root of the equation. For suppose the division performed, and let Q denote the quotient; then we shall have -2 x2+Ax2¬1+Bx2-2+.... +Tæ+V=Q(x−a). If, in this equation, we make x=a, the second member reduces to 0; consequently the first member reduces to 0; and, therefore, a is a root of the equation. |