Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

For, according to Horace's noted rule, no introduction should ever set out too high, or promise too much, lest the author should not fulfi the expectations he has raised.

What is of most importance in the tenour of the narration is, that it be perspicuous, animated, and enriched with all the beauties of poetry. No sort of composition requires more strength, dignity, and fire, than the epic poem. It is the region within which we look for every thing that is sublime in description, tender in sentiment, and bold and lively in expression; and, therefore, though an author's plan should be faultless, and his story ever so well conducted, yet, if he be feeble, or flat in style, destitute of affecting scenes, and defi cient in poetical colouring, he can have no success. The ornaments which epic poetry admits, must all be of the grave and chaste kind. Nothing that is loose, ludicrous, or affected, finds any place there. All the objects which it presents ought to be either great, or tender, or pleasing. Descriptions of disgusting or shocking objects, should, as much as possible, be avoided; and, therefore, the fable of the Harpies, in the third book of the Æneid, and the allegory of Sin and Death, in the second book of Paradise Lost, had been better omitted in these celebrated poems.

QUESTIONS.

Of what does it now remain to treat? epic poem? Of this definition, what is With which does our author begin? observed; and what does it compreOn what shall this lecture be employ- hend? But what is the pedantry of cried? After which, what shall be done? ticism? With minerals, plants, and aniOf the epic poem, what is allowed? mals, what can we do; and why? But What is, unquestionably, the highest with regard to works of taste and imaeffort of poetical genius? Hence, what gination, what is observed? When emfollows? On this subject, what have ployed in such attempts, into what critics displayed? By tedious disquisi- does criticism degenerate? To class tions, what have they done? By Bos- what poems, therefore, with the Iliad su's definition, what is it? Of this defi- and the Æneid, does our author not scrunition, what is observed? What does ple? They are, undoubtedly, all of he say is the first thing which either a what character? What cannot our auwriter of fables, or of heroic poems, thor allow; yet, what is certain? Of does? Next, what does he do? And its effect in promoting virtue, what is lastly, what? Of this idea, what is ob- observed; and what remark follows? served? Repeat the whole account of From what does its effect arise? What the origin of the Iliad, according to is the end which it proposes? How, Bossu. What is said of him who can only, can this be accomplished; and believe Homer to have proceeded in why? What objects, in the course of this manner; and what may one, with such compositions, are presented to our great certainty, pronounce? Of what minds, under the most honourable cocan no person of taste entertain a lours; and consequently, how are we doubt? How is this illustrated? Be-affected? What is, indeed, no small sides the instruction which Bossu as- testimony in honour of virtue? Of the signs to the Iliad, what other may as weight of this testimony, what is obnaturally be considered the moral of served? What sufficiently mark its dis:hat poem ? What is the subject of the tinction from other kinds of poetry? poem? How does Jupiter avenge How is this remark illustrated? By Achilles; and what is he effect of what is it sufficiently distinguished from Achilles' continued obstinacy? What history; and from tragedy? What is the plain account of the nature of an does it require? How does it compare

with dramatic poetry? But, in order to property required in the epic poem ? give a more particular and critical Why is it not sufficient for this purpose view of it, under what three heads that it be great? On what will much shall we consider it? What three pro-depend; and what examples are menperties mus the action, or subject of tioned? Of most of the great epie po the epic poem, have? To remark what, ems, what, in this respect, is observed? has our author had frequent occasion? But what is the chief circumstance With the highest reason, on what does which renders an epic poem interestAristotle insist; and why? In a regu-ing? How is this fully illustrated? lar epic, how will the effect be rendered What epic poets are the most happy more perfect; and for this reason, what in this respect? On what, also, does has Aristotle observed? How is the re- much depend, for rendering the poem mark fully illustrated, that in all the interesting? What effect must they great epic poems, unity of action is produce? What do these dangers, of sufficiently apparent? What does not obstacles, form; and in the judicious the unity of the epie exclude? What conduct of them, consists what? In Is it necessary here to observe? To what manner must he conduct it? what was the term originally applied; What is manifest? What question has and whence transferred? What did been moved? To what opinion are Aristotle understand by episodes, in most critics inclined? Why do they an epic poem? What has been the appear to have reason on their side? effect of the obscurity of his meaning? What illustration of this remark folBut, dismissing so fruitless a controver- lows? To this general practice, what sy, what do we now understand by two exceptions have we; and how de them? Of this nature, what examples are given? Of such episodes as these, what is observed? What is the first rule given, regarding them? What episode is faulty, by transgressing this rule; and of it, what is remarked? In proportion to what, should episodes always be the shorter? What cannot, with propriety, be called episodes; and what are they? In the next place, what ought episodes to present to us; and why? In so long a work, what is their effect? What illustrations of this remark follow? What is the last direction regarding the episode; and what instances are mentioned? What does the unity of the epic action necessarily suppose? By this, what is meant ?

they conclude? With regard to the duration of the epie action, what is ob served? Why is a considerable extent always allowed to it? What is the duration of the action of the Iliad, of the Odyssey, and of the Æneid? How may the duration of two of these poems be brought into a much smaller compass? Within what compass are they thus brought? Having treated of the epic action, to what does our author next proceed? As it is the business of the epic poet to copy after nature, and to form a probable and interesting tale, what must he study to do? What does Aristotle call this? What is, by no means, necessary? Though vicious characters may find a proper place, What is the second property of the yet, what does the nature of epic poeepic action? Of this, what is observed? try seem to require? But whatever What contributes to the grandeur of the character of his actors be, about the epic subject? Who, in the choice what must he take care; and for what of their subjects, have transgressed this reason? Into what two kinds may rule; and what is the consequence? poetic characters be divided? What To what is antiquity favourable; and are general characters; what are parwhy? When is this liberty abridged; ticular characters; and what do they and what must he, consequently, do; exhibit? In drawing such particulai or, if he goes beyond it, what disadvan-characters, what is chiefly exerted? tage follows? Why cannot these observations be applied to dramatic writing? Of such passions, what is observed? What may, therefore, furnish very proper materials for tragedy? But, for epic poetry, what is the safest region and why? What is the third

What remark follows? What is it at present sufficient to do? What has been the practice of all epic poets? As this is considered essential to epic composition, with what advantages is i attended? What question Las been asked; how answered; and what re

Epic poetry.

ANALYSIS.

1. Bossu's definition.

mark follows? Besides human actors, is the former? In the invocation of the what other personages, usually, occupy muse, what is observed? What is perno small place in epic poetry? To fectly trifling; and why? What is of what does this bring us? On this sub-most importance in the tenour of the ject, what has been the opinion of narration; and what remark follows? French critics; and of this decision, It is the region within which we look what is observed? What did these for what; and, therefore, what fol poets do; but what does not thence fol- lows? Of what kind must the ornalow? How is this illustrated from Lu-ments of epic poetry be; and why? can, and from the author of Leonidas? | But though our author caunot admit that machinery is essential to the epic plan, with what opinion can he not agree; and why? What advantages does it afford? At the same time, how must this machinery be used; and what must the poet always remember? What remarks follow? With regard to allegorical personages, what is observed? Where are they sometimes allowable? In what should they never be permitted to bear any part; and why? In the narration of the poet, what is not material; and why? What is the chief advantage that arises from the latter method? When is this method, therefore, preferable; and when

A. Illustrated.
B. Criticised.

2. The author's definition.
A. Its design.

3. The character of the epic poem.
A. The action.

a. Unity.

(a.) Illustrated.

(b.) Episodes not excluded.
Their requisites.

b. Greatness requisite.

c. It must be interesting.

4. The characters to be introduced in
epic poetry.

A. General and particular.
B. The hero.

c. The machinery.
5. The narration.

LECTURE XLIII.

HOMER'S ILIAD AND ODYSSEY.-VIRGIL'S ENEID. As the epic poem is universally allowed to possess the highest rank among poetical works, it merits a particular discussion. Having treated of the nature of this composition, and the principal rules relating to it, I proceed to make some observations on the most distinguished epic poems, ancient and modern.

Homer claims, on every account, our first attention, as the father not only of epic poetry, but, in some measure, of poetry in general. Whoever sits down to read Homer, must consider that he is going to read the most ancient book in the world, next to the Bible. Without making this reflection, he cannot enter into the spirit, nor relish the composition of the author. He is not to look for the correctness and elegance of the Augustan age. He must divest himself of our modern ideas of dignity and refinement, and transport his imagination almost three thousand years back in the history of nankind. What he is to expect, is a picture of the ancient world. He must reckon upon finding characters and manners, that retain a considerable tincture of the savage state; moral ideas, as yet imperfectly formed; and the appetites and passions of men brought under none of those restraints to which, in a more advanced state of society, they are accustomed; but bodily strength prized as one of the chief heroic endowments; the preparing of a meal, and the appeas

ing of hunger, described as very interesting objects; and the heroes boasting of themselves openly, scolding one another outrageously. and glorying, as we should now think very indecently, over their fallen enemies.

The opening of the Iliad possesses none of that sort of dignity, which a modern looks for in a great epic poem. It turns on no higher subject, than the quarrel of two chieftains about a female slave The priest of Apollo beseeches Agamemnon to restore his daughter. who, in the plunder of a city, had fallen to Agamemnon's share of booty. He refuses. Apollo, at the prayer of his priest, sends a plague into the Grecian camp. The angur, when consulted, declares that there is no way of appeasing Apollo, but by restoring the daughter of his priest. Agamemnon is enraged at the augur; professes that he likes this slave better than his wife Clytemnestra; but since he must restore her, in order to save the army, insists to have another in her place; and pitches upon Briseis, the slave of Achilles. Achilles, as was to be expected, kindles into a rage at this demand; reproaches him for his rapacity and insolence, and after giving him many hard names, solemnly swears, that, if he is to be thus treated by the general, he will withdraw his troops, and assist the Grecians no more against the Trojans. He withdraws accordingly. His mother, the goddess Thetis, interests Jupiter in his cause; who, to revenge the wrong which Achilles had suffered, takes part against the Greeks, and suffers them to fall into great and long distress; until Achilles is pacified, and reconciliation brought about between him and Agamemnon.

Such is the basis of the whole action of the Iliad. Hence rise all those speciosa miracula,' as Horace terms them, which fill that extracrdinary poem; and which have had the power of interesting almost all the nations of Europe, during every age, since the days of Homer. The general admiration commanded by a poetical plan, so very different from what any one would have formed in our times, ought not, upon refiection, to be matter of surprise. For, besides that a fertile genius can enrich and beautify any subject on which it is employed, it is to be observed, that ancient manners, how much soever they contradict our present notions of dignity and refinement, afford, nevertheless, materials for poetry, superior, in some respects, to those which are furnished by a more polished state of society. They discover human nature more open and undisguised, without any of those studied forms of behaviour which now conceal men from one another. They give free scope to the strongest and most impetuous emotions of the mind, which make a better figure in description than calm and temperate feelings. They show us our native prejudices, appetites, and desires, exerting themselves without control. From this state of manners, joined with the advantage of that strong and expressive style, which, as I formerly observed, commonly distinguishes the compositions of early ages, we have ground to look for more of the boldness, case, and freedom of native genius, in compositions of such a period, than in those of more civilized And, accordingly, the two great characters of the Homeric

times.

poetry are fire and simplicity. Let us now proceed to make some more particular observations on the Iliad, under the three heads of the subject and action, the characters, and narration of the poet.

The subject of the Iliad must unquestionably be admitted to be, in the main, happily chosen. In the days of Homer, no object er ld be more splendid and dignified than the Trojan war. So great a confederacy of the Grecian states, under one leader, and the ten years' siege which they carried on against Troy, must have spread far abroad the renown of many military exploits, and interested all Greece in the traditions concerning the heroes who had most emi nently signalized themselves. Upon these traditions Homer grounded his poem; and though he lived as is generally believed, only two or three centuries after the Trojan war, yet, through the want of written records, tradition must, by this time, have fallen into the degree of obscurity most proper for poetry; and have left him at full liberty to mix as much fable as he pleased with the remains of true history. He has not chosen for his subject the whole Trojan war; but, with great judgmert, he has selected one part of it, the quarrel betwixt Achilles and Agamemnon, and the events to which that quarrel gave rise; which, though they take up forty-seven days only, yet included the most interesting and most critical period of the war. By this management, he has given greater unity to what would have otherwise been an unconnected history of battles He has gained one hero, or principal character, Achilles, who reigns throughout the work; and he has shown the pernicious effect of discord among confederated princes. At the same time, I admit that Homer is less fortunate in his subject than Virgil. The plan of the Eneid includes a greater compass, and a more agreeable diversity of events; whereas the Iliad is almost entirely filled with battles.

The praise of high invention has, in every age, been given to Homer, with the greatest reason. The prodigious number of incidents, of speeches, of characters divine and human, with which he abounds; the surprising variety with which he has diversified his battles, in the wounds and deaths, and little history pieces of almost all the persons slain, discover an invention next to boundless. But the praise of judgment is, in my opinion, no less due to Homer, than that of invention. His story is all along conducted with great art. He rises upon us gradually; his heroes are brought out, one after another, to be objects of our attention. The distress thickens, as the poem advances; and every thing is so contrived as to aggrandize Achilles, and to render him, as the poet intended he should be, the capital figure.

But that wherein Homer excels all writers is the characteristical part. Here he is without a rival. His lively and spirited exhibition. of characters is, in a great measure, owing to his being so dramatic a writer, abounding every where with dialogue and conversation. There is much more dialogue in Homer than in Virgil: or, indeed, than in any other poet. What Virgil informs us of by two words of narration, Homer brings about by a speech. We may observe here, that this method of writing is more ancient than

« AnteriorContinuar »