« AnteriorContinuar »
Though in the established version, Luke xxiv. 4. is rendered “two men stood by them,” the original word arsornoz, does not necessarily import a posture, but may be rendered “appeared to them,” or “suddenly appeared to them.” The same verb having this similar application in Luke ii. 9. Acts xxiii. 11. and is attributed to it by H. Stephens. Newcome, &c. In Luke xxiv. 5. the verb “they said” occurs plurally, in the other Evangelists singularly. This circumstance is already explained by note on page 399, where a similar passage is noticed. The disciples, who collectively had been frequently denominated the Twelve, after the death of Judas, had the appellation of the Eleven. This is applied by Luke xxiv. 33. and Mark xvi. 14. as their general title, though at that time ten only were present, Thomas (see John xx. 24.) not being with them. Paul, in the 1st Cor. xv. 5, and John xx. 24. speaks of them under the former appellation of the Twelve, though, Judas being dead and Thomas then absent, ten only can be enumerated. This application of the two numbers may appear contradictory, yet as it was not unfrequent, but even general, among writers prior to and about that age, to adopt the same modes of expression (as the following extract obviously shews) no contradiction can be eventually attached to the sacred writers. “Grotius hath observed that Xenophon calls the governors of Athens by the name of the thirty, when Theramenes, one of them, was dead; and that in the book of Judges, the seventy sons of Gideon are said to be slain, whilst Jotham, one of them, was alive. I add, that Livy calls by the name of Decemviri, or, The ten men, only five of them, who had the joint command of the Roman army in Tusculum (lib. 3. c. 43.) and a little after (lib. 3. c. 51) he gives the same name to three of them, who had the joint command of the army against the Sabines; and even (c. 49. line 20.) to those two of them, who were left at Rome to take care of the city.” Chandler. John xxi. 7. For he was naked. This phrase does not denote absolute nakedness, but is often applied to those who are without an upper garment. Nudus (a Latin word of the same signification) is used in the same manner. So Virgil (Georg. i. 299.) gives this order to the husbandman.—Nudus ara, sere nudus.-Harwood. John xxi. 21. If I will that he tarry till I come. History informs us that St. John lived long after the destruction of Jerusalem (to which the words, “till I come,” refer. See Matt. xxiv. 3–44. xvi. 28, &c.) and Christ had given the intimation that John should see that event, for he once said
to his disciples, “there be some standing here who shall
8. Mark xvi. 8. Luke xxiv. 8–11. Peter and John having heard Mary Magdalene's report of his having been taken away, and the women's of his having risen, run to the sepulchre, and find the body removed according to their information, and wondering at what was come to pass, return home. (Luke xxiv. 12. John xx. 3—10.) The resurrection having been stated to the disciples at Jerusalem, at this period. (Luke xxiv. 22—24.) Cleophas and his companion leave their brethren, to go to Emmaus. Mary Magdalene goes again to the sepulchre, tarries there after the apostles (John xx. 11.) and converses with the two angels, who had before appeared to the women. Turning herself back, she perceives Jesus, who gradually makes himself known unto her; she consequently hastens to the city, and announces this his first appearance to the disciples, but they believe not. (Mark xvi. 9–11. John xx. 11–18.) The other women, having told the disciples of his resurrection, continue in the city, whilst Peter and John visit, and Mary Magdalene revisits, the sepulchre: they then go back again, and upon finding it deserted, return towards Jerusalem. On their way Jesus meets, and requests them to direct his disciples to depart into Galilee. (Matt. xxviii. 9–10.) This is his second appearance. The guards about this time leave the neighbourhood of the sepulchre, and inform the Jewish rulers of what had occurred within their knowledge. Matt. xxviii. 11—15.) According to Paul (1 Corinth. xv. 5.) the third appearance is to Cephas; and the fourth, to the two who some time prior to this left their brethren, to proceed to Emmaus; who, immediately returning to Jerusalem, relate it to the other disciples, and are not credited. (Mark xvi. 12, 13. Luke xxiv. 13–36.) The last time of his being seen on the day of his resurrection being the fifth, was by the apostles, as they sat at meat, in the absence of Thomas (Paul 1 Corinth. xv. 5. Mark. xvi. 14–18. Luke xxiv. 36–49. John xx. 19–23.) This concludes the great and glorious transactions of the important day on which Jesus rose from the dead. About the eighth day after his resurrection, he again the sixth time appears to the disciples, when Thomas was present. (John xx. 24–29.) His seventh appearance occurs between the eighth and the fortieth day, at the sea of Tiberias, to his disciples, (Matt. xxviii. 16. John xxi. 1–24.) and his eighth, to them upon the mountain in Galilee. (Matt. xxviii. 16—20.) Paul (1 Corinth. xv. 6.) relates his having been seen of above five hundred brethren at once, many of whom, at the time of his writing this epistle, are living witnesses to this, the ninth appearance. His tenth is to James, and his final appearance, being the eleventh, is to the apostles, on the
ascension. (1 Corinth. xv. 7. Acts i. 3–12. Mark Xvi. 19, 20. Luke xxiv. 50–53.)
434. John xxi. 25. And there are diso many other things which jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. The construction of this verse in our present translation is fully justified, in adducing from the Old Testament expressions of equal latitude, (See Exod. iii. 8. Judges vii. 12. 1 Kings x. 27, &c.) and which are not unusual in the magnificent luxuriance of an oriental style, though rarely occurring in the simple artless narrations of the apostles.
This text may, nevertheless, be considered in a sense
somewhat different. The same Fvangelist (John) frequently uses the word world, in a general sense, to denote its inhabitants, ch. viii. 26. and in other places, as ch. xv. 18, expressive of wicked and unbelieving men. The Greek word (zatia) here translated contain, is not only used in that sense, but when applied to the mind, denotes the reception and understanding of anything, and in Matt. xix. 11–12. and Philem 15, is rendered by this construction. By adopting these observations, the text reads to this purport, “I am persuad: ed the world itself would not receive the books that should be written.” (Doddridge's translation.) Whitby, Chandler, Harwood, with many others, have supported this construction, under the idea of greater propriety of application. In addition to whose opinion, it may be observed, that in this day, under the more extended diffusion of evangelical truth, the same disposition of undervaluing, and, in no small degree, rejecting these sacred records, seems lamentably prevalent, and bears strong testimony to the justness of John's asser tion.
Parable of the blind leading
INDEX TO PARABLES.
Why Jesus spoke in parables & the highest seat
of the great supper -- 287
; go — of the proposal for
building a tower
— oftherelapsingdemoniac l l l – of the lost sheep - - - 240
of the rich man's ground 117
of the tares - - - - - - 129
of the leaven - - - - - 13 l
every kind of fish
old garment - -
of the plant not plant-
of the king and two
of the man casting? 3O -
of the labourers in
far journey - - -
* > J.