Acerca de este libro
Mi biblioteca
Libros en Google Play
ON THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE INNOCENT FOR THE GUILTY. 261
Note by the Editor
263
Sermon
265
The Argument from the Order of Time in which Baptism
and the Lord's Supper are supposed to have been instituted 293
SECTION II.
The Argument for Strict Communion from the Order of
Words in the Apostolic Commission, considered
304
SECTION III.
The Argument from Apostolical Precedent, and from the dif-
ferent Significations of the two Institutions, considered
309
SECTION IV.
Our supposed Opposition to the Universal Suffrages of the
Church, considered
316
PART II.
The Positive Grounds on which we justify the Practice of
Mixed Communion
321
SECTION I.
Free Communion urged, from the Obligation of Brotherly
Love
321 SECTION II.
Page
The Practice of Open Communion argued, from the express
Injunction of Scripture respecting the Conduct to be main-
tained by sincere Christians who differ in their Religious
Sentiments
324
Pedobaptists a Part of the true Church, and their Exclusion
on that account unlawful
332
The Exclusion of Pedobaptists from the Lord's Table con-
sidered as a Punishment.
337
SECTION V.
On the Impossibility of reducing the Practice of Strict Com-
munion to any general Principle
344
SECTION VL.
The Impolicy of the Practice of Strict Communion considered 351
POSTSCRIPT
360
ON THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN BAPTISM
AND THE BAPTISM OF JOHN
Preface.
363
365
A REPLY TO THE REV. JOSEPH KINGHORN, BEING A FURTHER
VINDICATION OF THE PRACTICE OF FREE COMMUNION
391
393
.
PART I.
The Fundamental Position; or, the supposed necessary
Connexion between the two positive Institutes of Chris-
tianity examined
401
CHAPTER I.
Remarks on Mr. Kinghorn's Statement of the Controversy
CHAPTER II.
His Attempt to establish the Connexion contended for from
the Apostolic Commission and Primitive Precedent
406
CHAPTER 111.
The supposed necessary Connexion between the two posi-
tive Institutes further discussed, wherein other Arguments
are examined
Pago
The Collateral Topics introduced by Mr. Kinghorn con-
sidered
436
CHAPTER IV.
The Charge of dispensing with a Christian Ordinance con-
CHAPTER V.
An Inquiry how far the Practice of Mixed Communion af-
fects the Grounds of Dissent from the Church of England
and from the Church of Rome .
443
CHAPTER VI.
452
The Propriety of appealing, in this controversy, to the pe-
culiar Principles of the Pedobaptists, briefly examined
and discussed
PART III.
In which the Insufficiency of the Reply Mr. Kinghorn has
made to the principal Arguments urged for Mixed Com-
munion is exposed
457
CHAPTER VII.
His Reply to the Argument deduced from the Scriptural
Injunction of Mutual Forbearance and Brotherly Love,
considered
CHAPTER VIII.
On the Argument for Mixed Communion founded on the
Pedobaptists being a part of the true Church
470
CHAPTER IX.
The Injustice of the Exclusion of other Denominations con-
474
CHAPTER X.
On the Contrariety of the Maxims and Sentiments of the
Advocates of Strict Communion to those which prevailed
in the early Ages; in which the Innovation imputed to
them by the Author is vindicated from the Charge of
Misrepresentation .
481
CHAPTER XI.
Conclusion.
493