There are five principal strains to which materials may be subjected, namely, the Tensile, Shearing, Crushing, Transverse, and Torsional strains : essentially all strains are modifications or combinations of the Tensile and Crushing ones, but it will be convenient in practice to consider each of them as distinct and specific. (1.) “ Central Strain.”—When the cross-section of a body is of a regular figure, and the tensile strain is in the centre, it is commonly admitted that the resistance is simply proportional to the area, and that every part of the section is equally strained. This may be practically true in many cases, but where the body is wide or large, the central part is more stretched than the edges, and the strain becomes very unequal. For example, Fig. 1 is a plate of very elastic material whose normal form unloaded is a, b, c, d, and when strained by the central load W it becomes e, f, g, h. Obviously the central part is more stretched g and therefore more strained than the edges, and if the load be increased up to the point of rupture, the plate will break first at the centre. (2.) “Strain out of Centre."—When the strain coincides with one edge of a plate as in Fig. 2, the primitive form i, k, l, m, tends to take the form n, o, p, r, and we have this remarkable result, that the maximum extension and corresponding strain at n, o, is progressively reduced towards 8, t, where it becomes nil, and between 8, P, and t, r, the plate is compressed, not B = stretched, and thus a crushing strain is created by a nominally tensile one. Say, that we take a spiral spring whose normal length unloaded = 10 inches, and its elasticity such that it extends 1 inch per lb.; also let 4 lbs. be the breaking weight, the maximum length being then 14 inches. Let B, C, D, E in Fig. 3 be four such springs attached at equal distances to two rigid crossbars F, G: if now a tensile strain of 16 lbs. be applied at the centre-line H, J, obviously the whole of the springs will be extended to 14 inches, each yielding the 4 lbs. due to it. In Fig. 4, K, L, M, N, are the centre lines of four springs similar to those in Fig. 3, but here the centre line of the strain coincides with L, Q, or the centre of the spring L. Now, it is essential that the forces on the two sides of the centre line should balance one another: they will arrange themselves as in the figure; thus the strain on K being 4, and its distance from the centre = 1:0, we have 4 x 1 4, as the effect of the spring K. Then, on the other side, M = 2 x1 = 2.0, and N = 1 x 2 2:0 also : the sum of the two being 4, or the same as K. Then the weight at W, with which the spring K will break, becomes as in the figure, 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10 lbs., whereas with a central strain as in Fig. 3 we obtained 16 lbs., or 60 per cent. more than in Fig. 4. (3.) To show how a compressive strain may be generated by a nominally tensile load, let Fig. 5 be an arrangement similar to the preceding, but one where the tensile strain coincides with the centre line of the spring R, or the extreme edge of the combination. In this case the spring R bears the maximum load of 4 lbs., but S = 2 lbs. only: the spring T is neither extended nor compressed, but retains its normal length of 10 inches; it is therefore useless. The spring U is compressed to the length of 8 inches, and bears a crushing strain of 2 lbs. The tensile load at X from R = 4 lbs., from S 2 x1 = 2 = 1.0; from T 0, and from U = 2 x1 = 2 = 1:0; the total being 4 +1+0+1 6 lbs., whereas with a central load as in Fig. 3 we had 16 lbs.; hence the ratio 6 = 16 = .375 to 1.0. Mr. Hodgkinson found by experiment that a cast-iron bar which broke with a central load of 7.65 tons, failed with a 2.62 tons only when the force coincided with one side of the bar, the ratio being 2.62 = 7.65 = .342 to 1.0, or nearly as we found it by calculation. These illustrations will serve to show the importance of arranging for the tensile strain to coincide with the axis of the body, or the centre line of the section, and that where this is impracticable, due allowance should be made for the fact. (4.) “Experimental Results.”—Table 1 gives a general summary of the most important experiments on the tensile strength of materials, from which it appears than the mean breaking weight of: Cast Iron Wrought Iron Steel Bar Copper Bolts may be taken at:- 16.0 35,840 lbs. Table 2 gives the breaking weight of round bars from inch to 3 inches diameter, calculated from these data. (5.) “ Effect of Re-melting Cast Iron.”_Ordinary cast iron is usually from the 2nd fusion, pig iron being the 1st: it has been found that with some kinds of iron at least, the tensile strength is very much increased by repeated re-melting; thus one set of experiments gave for iron of the 1 2 3 4th melting, the tensile strength per square inch = 14,000 20,900 30,300 35,785 lbs. Another series gave 11,020 15,942 35,846 45,970 lbs. The mean of the two series in tons per square inch 8.2 18.26 (6.) But Mr. Fairbairn obtained very different results, as given by Table 3, which shows that the transverse and tensile strengths were reduced by re-melting so far as the 3rd, then TABLE 1.-Of the TENSILE STRENGTH OF MATERIALS. lbs. tons. lbs. Ibs. 99 99 .. Wrought-iron, rolled bar, Yorkshire Staffordshire British shearing tensile strength, same iron crossway 61,480 27.4 Napier and Sons. 160 Exp. 97 56,005 52,000 37,161 52,352 41,391 53,349 | 48,912 .. .. .. .. .. Shropshire, solid, crossway Staffordshire, solid, lengthway Staffordshire, solid, crossway mean of the four kinds, &c. Stoel bar, rolled or tilted hardened in water tempered yellow spring temper tempered blue highly heated and cooled in oil hardened and annealed welded joints .. Steel-plate, solid or unpunched punched plate, not annealed annealed steel rivets crossway stud-linked, cable wire to inch diameter Stirling's toughened 49,651 48,912 49,281 22:00 90,019 40.2 121,716 54.3 81,133 36.22 H. Sharp. 96,163 87,606 91,885 41.02 14,270 6.37 E. Clark. 80,214 35.8 | Telford. 23,468 12,716 16,000 7.142 Hodgkinson and Fair bairn. 32,077 23,461 27,916 12:46 Owen, &c. 96,300 73,185 32:67 Anderson. 1,273 0.568 Muschenbroek. .. .. : : : : ?? 83,000 78,430 |